Tianhang Luo, Guoen Fang, Jianwei Bi, Liye Ma
Department of General Surgery, Changhai Hospital, The Second Military Medical University, Shanghai 200433, China.
J Gastrointest Surg. 2008 Jul;12(7):1263-7. doi: 10.1007/s11605-008-0529-4. Epub 2008 May 8.
The availability of different treatment options for gastric carcinoma has reopened the question of correct definition of high-risk categories, which may help in identifying patients with high risk for poor prognosis who would benefit more from adjuvant therapy after operation. Perineural invasion (PNI) seems to provide useful information for management. Therefore, we examined the effect of PNI on overall survival (OS) in patients with gastric carcinoma and the association between PNI and other clinical and pathological factors.
A total of 1,632 patients with gastric carcinoma from 2000 to 2005 were analyzed retrospectively. Paraffin sections of surgical specimens from all patients who underwent gastric resection were stained with laminin. If carcinoma cells infiltrated into the perineurium or neural fascicles, PNI was assessed as positive. Survival analysis was done in 1,372 patients with T1-T4 tumors who underwent curative resection.
PNI was positive in 518 of the 1,632 patients (31.7%). The size of tumors, T stage, differentiation of tumor, and clinical stage were significantly related to PNI positivity. The proportion of large tumors was significantly higher in PNI-positive patients than in PNI-negative patients (P < 0.01). As the depth of gastric mural invasion or clinical stage increased, the positive rate of PNI also increased. The OS of the PNI-positive patients was significantly shorter than that of the PNI-negative patients in the univariate analysis (P < 0.01). At multivariate Cox proportional hazards model of OS analysis, the positivity of PNI appeared to be an independent prognostic factor for OS (hazards ratio [HR] = 3.23, 95%CI = 2.6-8.11, P < 0.01), which was also influenced by tumor differentiation, T stage, and clinical stage (P < 0.01).
Our results suggested that the incidence of PNI was high in gastric carcinoma and that it corresponded to the progression of disease. It could provide additional information for identifying patients who are at high risk for poor prognosis. PNI can be a candidate for a new kind of prognostic parameters.
胃癌不同治疗方案的出现再次引发了高危类别正确定义的问题,这可能有助于识别预后不良风险高的患者,这些患者术后可能从辅助治疗中获益更多。神经周围浸润(PNI)似乎能为治疗提供有用信息。因此,我们研究了PNI对胃癌患者总生存期(OS)的影响以及PNI与其他临床和病理因素之间的关联。
回顾性分析了2000年至2005年期间的1632例胃癌患者。对所有接受胃切除术患者的手术标本石蜡切片进行层粘连蛋白染色。如果癌细胞浸润到神经束膜或神经束中,则PNI评估为阳性。对1372例接受根治性切除的T1 - T4期肿瘤患者进行生存分析。
1632例患者中有518例(31.7%)PNI呈阳性。肿瘤大小、T分期、肿瘤分化程度和临床分期与PNI阳性显著相关。PNI阳性患者中大型肿瘤的比例显著高于PNI阴性患者(P < 0.01)。随着胃壁浸润深度或临床分期增加,PNI阳性率也增加。单因素分析中,PNI阳性患者的OS显著短于PNI阴性患者(P < 0.01)。在OS分析的多因素Cox比例风险模型中,PNI阳性似乎是OS的独立预后因素(风险比[HR] = 3.23,95%CI = 2.6 - 8.11,P < 0.01),其也受肿瘤分化、T分期和临床分期影响(P < 0.01)。
我们的结果表明,胃癌中PNI的发生率较高,且与疾病进展相关。它可为识别预后不良高风险患者提供额外信息。PNI可作为一种新型预后参数的候选指标。