• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

促进适应性情绪分析:区分对抑郁经历的疏离分析与沉浸分析及分心。

Facilitating adaptive emotional analysis: distinguishing distanced-analysis of depressive experiences from immersed-analysis and distraction.

作者信息

Kross Ethan, Ayduk Ozlem

机构信息

Columbia University, USA.

出版信息

Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2008 Jul;34(7):924-38. doi: 10.1177/0146167208315938. Epub 2008 May 9.

DOI:10.1177/0146167208315938
PMID:18469151
Abstract

Two studies examined the psychological processes that facilitate adaptive emotional analysis. In Study 1, participants recalled a depression experience and then analyzed their feelings from either a self-immersed (immersed-analysis) or self-distanced (distanced-analysis) perspective. Participants in the distanced-analysis group focused less on recounting their experience and more on reconstruing it, which in turn led to lower levels of depressed affect. Furthermore, comparisons to a distraction group indicated that distanced-analysis was as effective as distraction in reducing depressed affect relative to the immersed-analysis group. Study 2 replicated these findings and showed that both 1 day and 7 days after the experimental manipulations, participants in the distanced-analysis group remained buffered against depressed affect and reported experiencing fewer recurring thoughts about their depression experience over time compared to both the immersed-analysis and distraction groups.

摘要

两项研究考察了促进适应性情绪分析的心理过程。在研究1中,参与者回忆一段抑郁经历,然后从自我沉浸(沉浸式分析)或自我疏离(疏离式分析)的角度分析自己的感受。疏离式分析组的参与者较少关注叙述自己的经历,而更多地关注重新解读它,这反过来又导致较低水平的抑郁情绪。此外,与分心组的比较表明,相对于沉浸式分析组,疏离式分析在减少抑郁情绪方面与分心一样有效。研究2重复了这些发现,并表明在实验操作后的1天和7天,疏离式分析组的参与者相对于沉浸式分析组和分心组,仍然能够抵御抑郁情绪,并且随着时间的推移,报告称对自己抑郁经历的反复思考较少。

相似文献

1
Facilitating adaptive emotional analysis: distinguishing distanced-analysis of depressive experiences from immersed-analysis and distraction.促进适应性情绪分析:区分对抑郁经历的疏离分析与沉浸分析及分心。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2008 Jul;34(7):924-38. doi: 10.1177/0146167208315938. Epub 2008 May 9.
2
"Asking why" from a distance: its cognitive and emotional consequences for people with major depressive disorder.从远处“问为什么”:对重度抑郁症患者的认知和情绪后果。
J Abnorm Psychol. 2012 Aug;121(3):559-69. doi: 10.1037/a0028808. Epub 2012 Jun 18.
3
The effect of self-distancing on adaptive versus maladaptive self-reflection in children.自我抽离对儿童适应性自我反省和不适应性自我反省的影响。
Emotion. 2011 Oct;11(5):1032-9. doi: 10.1037/a0021787.
4
Asking 'why' from a distance facilitates emotional processing: a reanalysis of Wimalaweera and Moulds (2008).远距离追问“为什么”有助于情绪加工:对维马拉维拉和莫尔兹(2008年)研究的重新分析
Behav Res Ther. 2009 Jan;47(1):88-92. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2008.06.014. Epub 2008 Oct 21.
5
When asking "why" does not hurt. Distinguishing rumination from reflective processing of negative emotions.当追问“为什么”并无坏处时。区分对负面情绪的反复思考与反思性处理。
Psychol Sci. 2005 Sep;16(9):709-15. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2005.01600.x.
6
Adaptive and maladaptive self-focus in depression.抑郁症中适应性和适应不良的自我关注。
J Affect Disord. 2004 Oct 1;82(1):1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2003.10.006.
7
A comparison of the effects of thought suppression, distraction and concentration.思维抑制、分心和专注的效果比较。
Behav Res Ther. 2007 Dec;45(12):2924-37. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2007.08.004. Epub 2007 Aug 9.
8
Enhancing the pace of recovery: self-distanced analysis of negative experiences reduces blood pressure reactivity.加快恢复速度:对负面经历进行自我疏离分析可降低血压反应性。
Psychol Sci. 2008 Mar;19(3):229-31. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02073.x.
9
Processing memories of anger-eliciting events: the effect of asking 'why' from a distance.处理引发愤怒事件的记忆:远距离询问“为什么”的影响。
Behav Res Ther. 2008 Mar;46(3):402-9. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2007.12.006. Epub 2007 Dec 23.
10
Adaptive and maladaptive self-focus: a pilot extension study with individuals high and low in fear of negative evaluation.适应性和适应不良的自我关注:一项针对高恐惧和低恐惧负面评价个体的初步扩展研究。
Behav Ther. 2009 Jun;40(2):181-9. doi: 10.1016/j.beth.2008.05.003. Epub 2008 Oct 31.

引用本文的文献

1
Engagement and Disengagement: From the Basic Science of Emotion Regulation to an Anxiety Spectrum.参与和脱离:从情绪调节的基础科学到焦虑谱系
Psychophysiology. 2025 Feb;62(2):e70006. doi: 10.1111/psyp.70006.
2
From antidepressants and psychotherapy to oxytocin, vagus nerve stimulation, ketamine and psychedelics: how established and novel treatments can improve social functioning in major depression.从抗抑郁药、心理治疗到催产素、迷走神经刺激、氯胺酮和迷幻剂:成熟及新型治疗方法如何改善重度抑郁症患者的社交功能。
Front Psychiatry. 2024 Oct 14;15:1372650. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1372650. eCollection 2024.
3
A network approach to emotion regulation and symptom activation in depression and anxiety.
一种用于抑郁和焦虑的情绪调节和症状激活的网络方法。
Front Public Health. 2024 Sep 10;12:1362148. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1362148. eCollection 2024.
4
Targeting emotion dysregulation in depression: an intervention mapping protocol augmented by participatory action research.针对抑郁症的情绪失调:一项增强了参与式行动研究的干预映射方案。
BMC Psychiatry. 2024 Sep 4;24(1):595. doi: 10.1186/s12888-024-06045-y.
5
A history of PTSD changes the way people express themselves during the COVID-19 pandemic.创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)病史会改变人们在 COVID-19 大流行期间表达自己的方式。
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2024;15(1):2375904. doi: 10.1080/20008066.2024.2375904. Epub 2024 Jul 22.
6
How Do Care Partners of People with Rare Dementia Use Language in Online Peer Support Groups? A Quantitative Text Analysis Study.患有罕见痴呆症患者的照护伙伴如何在在线同伴支持小组中使用语言?一项定量文本分析研究。
Healthcare (Basel). 2024 Jan 25;12(3):313. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12030313.
7
Child inhibited temperament and caregiver distraction encouragement jointly predict children's delay of gratification competencies.儿童抑制气质和照料者分心鼓励共同预测儿童的延迟满足能力。
Sci Rep. 2024 Jan 20;14(1):1798. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-52288-w.
8
The Promise of Affective Language for Identifying and Intervening on Psychopathology.情感语言在识别和干预精神病理学方面的前景。
Affect Sci. 2023 Aug 2;4(3):517-521. doi: 10.1007/s42761-023-00199-w. eCollection 2023 Sep.
9
Are reframing strategies more effective than empathy in processing trauma reports? A pilot study.在处理创伤报告时,重新构建策略是否比同理心更有效?一项初步研究。
Front Psychol. 2023 Jul 3;14:1150475. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1150475. eCollection 2023.
10
Chasing elusive expressive writing effects: emotion-acceptance instructions and writer engagement improve outcomes.追寻难以捉摸的表达性写作效果:情感接纳指导与作者投入可改善结果。
Front Psychol. 2023 Jun 13;14:1192595. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1192595. eCollection 2023.