• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

抽奖激励措施并未提高邮寄调查问卷的回复率:一项随机对照试验。

Lottery incentives did not improve response rate to a mailed survey: a randomized controlled trial.

作者信息

Harris Ian A, Khoo Oliver K, Young Jane M, Solomon Michael J, Rae Hamish

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedics,Liverpool Hospital, Elizabeth Street, Liverpool, NSW 2170, Australia.

出版信息

J Clin Epidemiol. 2008 Jun;61(6):609-10. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2007.07.012. Epub 2008 Feb 14.

DOI:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2007.07.012
PMID:18471665
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Our study aimed to examine the effect of an instant lottery ticket incentive on the response rate to a mailed questionnaire in a population of trauma patients.

STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING

A randomized controlled trial at a major trauma center with 728 patients randomized into 2 groups prior to mailing of a questionnaire. One group of patients (Group A) had a sentence inserted into the cover letter stating that they would receive a $4 instant lottery ticket upon receipt of a completed questionnaire; Group B did not have an incentive. The response rate for both groups was measured after the initial mailing and at the end of the study. The results were analyzed using the X2 test to compare 2 proportions and a P value of .05 was considered significant.

RESULTS

The early response rate in Group A was lower than in Group B, and the response rates for both groups were similar at final follow-up. The differences at both time periods were not statistically significant.

CONCLUSION

The use of an instant lottery ticket incentive did not improve the response rate to a mailed questionnaire.

摘要

目的

我们的研究旨在探讨即时彩票激励对创伤患者群体中邮寄问卷回复率的影响。

研究设计与背景

在一家大型创伤中心进行的一项随机对照试验,在邮寄问卷前将728例患者随机分为2组。一组患者(A组)在附信中插入一句话,表明他们在收到填好的问卷后将获得一张4美元的即时彩票;B组没有激励措施。在初次邮寄后和研究结束时测量两组的回复率。使用X2检验分析结果以比较两个比例,P值为0.05被认为具有统计学意义。

结果

A组的早期回复率低于B组,在最终随访时两组的回复率相似。两个时间段的差异均无统计学意义。

结论

使用即时彩票激励并未提高邮寄问卷的回复率。

相似文献

1
Lottery incentives did not improve response rate to a mailed survey: a randomized controlled trial.抽奖激励措施并未提高邮寄调查问卷的回复率:一项随机对照试验。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2008 Jun;61(6):609-10. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2007.07.012. Epub 2008 Feb 14.
2
A randomized trial of incentives to improve response rates to a mailed women's health questionnaire.一项关于激励措施以提高邮寄女性健康调查问卷回复率的随机试验。
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2003 Oct;12(8):821-8. doi: 10.1089/154099903322447783.
3
Response rates and representativeness: a lottery incentive improves physician survey return rates.回复率与代表性:抽奖激励提高了医生调查问卷的回复率。
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2005 Aug;14(8):571-7. doi: 10.1002/pds.1126.
4
Patient surveys in general practice: a randomised trial of an instant lottery ticket to increase return rate.
Aust Fam Physician. 1996 Jan;Suppl 1:S19-20.
5
The effects of lottery incentive and length of questionnaire on health survey response rates: a randomized study.彩票激励和问卷长度对健康调查回复率的影响:一项随机研究。
J Clin Epidemiol. 1999 Nov;52(11):1117-22. doi: 10.1016/s0895-4356(99)00051-7.
6
Response rates to a mailed survey targeting childhood cancer survivors: a comparison of conditional versus unconditional incentives.针对儿童癌症幸存者的邮寄调查问卷的回复率:有条件激励与无条件激励的比较。
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2005 May;14(5):1330-2. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-04-0716.
7
A randomised controlled trial to determine the effect on response of including a lottery incentive in health surveys [ISRCTN32203485].一项随机对照试验,旨在确定在健康调查中加入抽奖激励措施对回应率的影响[国际标准随机对照试验编号:ISRCTN32203485]
BMC Health Serv Res. 2004 Nov 8;4(1):30. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-4-30.
8
Including the questionnaire with an invitation letter did not improve a telephone survey's response rate.在邀请信中附上调查问卷并不能提高电话调查的回复率。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2007 Dec;60(12):1312-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2007.04.005. Epub 2007 Aug 24.
9
Physician response rates to a mail survey by specialty and timing of incentive.按专业和激励时机划分的医生对邮件调查的回复率。
Am J Prev Med. 2004 Apr;26(3):234-6. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2003.12.013.
10
Prepayment was superior to postpayment cash incentives in a randomized postal survey among physicians.在一项针对医生的随机邮政调查中,预付款优于事后付款现金激励措施。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2004 Aug;57(8):777-84. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2003.12.021.

引用本文的文献

1
Methods to increase response to postal and electronic questionnaires.增加邮寄和电子问卷回复率的方法。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Nov 30;11(11):MR000008. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000008.pub5.
2
Behavioral economics implementation: Regret lottery improves mHealth patient study adherence.行为经济学的应用:后悔彩票提高了移动健康患者研究的依从性。
Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2019 May 31;15:100387. doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2019.100387. eCollection 2019 Sep.
3
Improving response rate and quality of survey data with a scratch lottery ticket incentive.
用刮刮乐彩票激励提高调查数据的回复率和质量。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2012 Apr 19;12:52. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-12-52.
4
Assessing corporate social responsibility in China's sports lottery administration and its influence on consumption behavior.评估中国体育彩票管理中的企业社会责任及其对消费行为的影响。
J Gambl Stud. 2012 Sep;28(3):515-40. doi: 10.1007/s10899-011-9270-0.
5
Lottery-based versus fixed incentives to increase clinicians' response to surveys.基于彩票的激励与固定激励对提高临床医生参与调查的反应的比较。
Health Serv Res. 2011 Oct;46(5):1663-74. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2011.01264.x. Epub 2011 Apr 14.
6
The effects of tracking responses and the day of mailing on physician survey response rate: three randomized trials.跟踪回复和邮寄日期对医生调查回复率的影响:三项随机试验。
PLoS One. 2011 Feb 23;6(2):e16942. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0016942.
7
Patient-assessed satisfaction and outcome after microsurgical resection of cavernomas causing epilepsy.患者对致痫性海绵状血管畸形显微切除术后满意度和结局的评估。
Neurosurg Focus. 2010 Sep;29(3):E16. doi: 10.3171/2010.6.FOCUS10127.
8
Can incentives undermine intrinsic motivation to participate in epidemiologic surveys?激励措施会破坏参与流行病学调查的内在动机吗?
Eur J Epidemiol. 2010 Apr;25(4):231-5. doi: 10.1007/s10654-010-9434-8. Epub 2010 Feb 16.
9
Methods to increase response to postal and electronic questionnaires.提高对邮寄问卷和电子问卷回复率的方法。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009 Jul 8;2009(3):MR000008. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000008.pub4.