Suppr超能文献

跟踪回复和邮寄日期对医生调查回复率的影响:三项随机试验。

The effects of tracking responses and the day of mailing on physician survey response rate: three randomized trials.

机构信息

Department of Medicine, State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, New York, United States of America.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2011 Feb 23;6(2):e16942. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0016942.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The response rates to physician postal surveys remain modest. The primary objective of this study was to assess the effect of tracking responses on physician survey response rate (i.e., determining whether each potential participant has responded or not). A secondary objective was to assess the effects of day of mailing (Monday vs. Friday) on physician survey response rate.

METHODS

We conducted 3 randomized controlled trials. The first 2 trials had a 2 x 2 factorial design and tested the effect of day of mailing (Monday vs. Friday) and of tracking vs. no tracking responses. The third trial tested the effect of day of mailing (Monday vs. Friday). We meta-analyzed these 3 trials using a random effects model.

RESULTS

The total number of participants in the 3 trials was 1339. The response rate with tracked mailing was not statistically different from that with non-tracked mailing by the time of the first reminder (RR = 1.01 95% CI 0.84, 1.22; I²  =  0%). There was a trend towards lower response rate with tracked mailing by the time of the second reminder (RR = 0.91; 95% CI 0.78, 1.06; I²  =  0%). The response rate with mailing on Mondays was not statistically different from that with Friday mailing by the time of first reminder (RR = 1.01; 95% CI 0.87, 1.17; I²  =  0%), and by the time of the 2(nd) reminder (RR = 1.08; 95% CI 0.84, 1.39; I²  =  77%).

CONCLUSIONS

Tracking response may negatively affect physicians' response rate. The day of mailing does not appear to affect physicians' response rate.

摘要

背景

医生邮寄调查的回复率仍然较低。本研究的主要目的是评估跟踪回复对医生调查回复率的影响(即确定每个潜在参与者是否已回复)。次要目的是评估邮寄日期(星期一与星期五)对医生调查回复率的影响。

方法

我们进行了 3 项随机对照试验。前 2 项试验采用 2×2 析因设计,测试了邮寄日期(星期一与星期五)和跟踪与不跟踪回复的效果。第 3 项试验测试了邮寄日期(星期一与星期五)的效果。我们使用随机效应模型对这 3 项试验进行了荟萃分析。

结果

这 3 项试验的总参与者人数为 1339 人。在第一次提醒时,跟踪邮寄的回复率与非跟踪邮寄的回复率没有统计学差异(RR=1.01,95%CI 0.84,1.22;I²=0%)。在第二次提醒时,跟踪邮寄的回复率有下降的趋势(RR=0.91,95%CI 0.78,1.06;I²=0%)。在第一次提醒时,星期一邮寄的回复率与星期五邮寄的回复率没有统计学差异(RR=1.01,95%CI 0.87,1.17;I²=0%),在第二次提醒时也是如此(RR=1.08,95%CI 0.84,1.39;I²=77%)。

结论

跟踪回复可能会对医生的回复率产生负面影响。邮寄日期似乎不会影响医生的回复率。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8081/3044144/f9f441a4132c/pone.0016942.g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验