Lewis Jenny M, Baeza Juan I, Alexander Damon
School of Political Science, Criminology and Sociology, University of Melbourne, Parkville 3010, Australia.
Soc Sci Med. 2008 Jul;67(2):280-91. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2008.03.046. Epub 2008 May 9.
Partnerships represent a prescriptive form of network governance, based on the idea of cooperation. This article has four aims. The first is to describe why network governance and partnerships are important now, and what one particular example - Primary Care Partnerships - is addressing. The second is to analyse the network structure of two of these partnerships, and the third is to examine network dynamics. The fourth aim is to explore relationships and sustainability over the longer term. Two government-funded and steered partnerships, which were established to increase coordination between primary care services in Victoria, Australia, were examined. Annual interviews at three points in time between 2002 and 2005 were used to explore relationships between organizations within these two partnerships. The structure of two different communication networks, based on contacts for work and contacts for strategic information, were examined using social network analysis. Tracing network structures over time highlighted partnership dynamics. The network structures changed over the three years of the study, but an important constant was the continuing centrality of the independent staff employed to manage the partnerships. Over the longer term, it seems to be more important to fund independent partnership staff, rather than people who connect partnerships to the funding agency. If partnerships are seen as valuable in improving service coordination and health outcomes, then long term rather than just start-up funding support is required.
伙伴关系代表了一种基于合作理念的规范性网络治理形式。本文有四个目标。第一个目标是描述为何网络治理和伙伴关系在当下很重要,以及一个具体例子——初级保健伙伴关系——正在解决的问题。第二个目标是分析其中两个伙伴关系的网络结构,第三个目标是研究网络动态。第四个目标是探索长期的关系和可持续性。对澳大利亚维多利亚州为加强初级保健服务之间的协调而设立的两个由政府资助和主导的伙伴关系进行了考察。在2002年至2005年期间的三个时间点进行的年度访谈,用于探究这两个伙伴关系中各组织之间的关系。使用社会网络分析考察了基于工作联系和战略信息联系的两个不同沟通网络的结构。随着时间推移追踪网络结构突出了伙伴关系动态。在研究的三年中,网络结构发生了变化,但一个重要的常量是受雇管理伙伴关系的独立工作人员持续处于核心地位。从长远来看,为独立的伙伴关系工作人员提供资金似乎比为将伙伴关系与资助机构联系起来的人员提供资金更为重要。如果伙伴关系在改善服务协调和健康结果方面被视为有价值,那么就需要长期而非仅启动资金支持。