Lowdermilk D L, Fishel A H
School of Nursing, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill 27599.
J Nurs Educ. 1991 Jan;30(1):34-9. doi: 10.3928/0148-4834-19910101-09.
Use of computer simulations was studied as a strategy to evaluate clinical decision-making skills of 64 senior baccalaureate nursing students who were randomly assigned to experimental and control groups. All students completed Kolb's Learning Style Inventory, a pre- and posttest that was a computer assisted instruction (CAI) clinical simulation specific to the student's clinical placement, and a 36 item attitudinal and evaluative questionnaire developed for the study. The experimental group complete three additional simulations over a 7 week period. Change scores from pre- and posttests were analyzed to determine: 1) if students completing a CAI series demonstrated higher achievement on information-gathering and decision-making skills than students who did not complete the series; 2) if there was a correlation between achievement and clinical grades; and 3) if there was a relationship between achievement and a particular learning style. Although all students demonstrated that significant learning had occurred during the semester, there was no difference between the students completing the full CAI series and those who did not. Students who made significant improvements in decision-making scores also earned higher clinical grades. Success on the CAI series was found to be independent of learning style. Most students expressed positive attitudes about CAI.
研究了使用计算机模拟作为一种策略,以评估64名护理学学士学位高年级学生的临床决策技能,这些学生被随机分配到实验组和对照组。所有学生都完成了科尔布学习风格量表、一项前测和后测(该测试是针对学生临床实习地点的计算机辅助教学(CAI)临床模拟),以及为该研究开发的一份包含36个条目的态度和评估问卷。实验组在7周内完成了另外三个模拟。对前测和后测的变化分数进行分析,以确定:1)完成CAI系列的学生在信息收集和决策技能方面的成绩是否高于未完成该系列的学生;2)成绩与临床成绩之间是否存在相关性;3)成绩与特定学习风格之间是否存在关系。尽管所有学生都表明在学期中发生了显著的学习,但完成完整CAI系列的学生与未完成的学生之间没有差异。在决策分数上有显著提高的学生临床成绩也更高。发现CAI系列的成功与学习风格无关。大多数学生对CAI表达了积极的态度。