Brudenell I, Carpenter C S
School of Nursing, Oregon Health Sciences University.
J Nurs Educ. 1990 Feb;29(2):79-83. doi: 10.3928/0148-4834-19900201-08.
The purpose of this study was to determine if there was a relationship between learning style categories and attitudes toward computer assisted instruction (CAI). Few studies have attempted to compare adult learning style and attitude toward CAI. In a one group pre- and post-test design, two questionnaires were administered to adult students enrolled in a nursing research course, which integrated CAI as an instructional method. The Attitude Toward Computer Assisted Instruction Semantic Differential Tool (Allen, 1986) was completed twice. The Learning Style Inventory (Kolb, 1976), a self-report questionnaire to determine learning style, was completed once. Data analysis indicated a significantly greater negative attitude toward CAI post-test. Subjects in all four learning style categories had statistically significantly greater negative attitudes on the function subscale, with assimilators also having a significantly greater negative attitude on the creativity subscale, as well as in overall attitude. The increasingly negative attitude toward CAI in this study may reflect several factors: an evaluation of the CAI software, and subject expectations of the CAI that were not met.
本研究的目的是确定学习风格类别与对计算机辅助教学(CAI)的态度之间是否存在关联。很少有研究尝试比较成人学习风格与对CAI的态度。在单组前后测设计中,对参加护理研究课程的成年学生发放了两份问卷,该课程将CAI作为一种教学方法。《对计算机辅助教学的态度语义差异工具》(艾伦,1986年)填写了两次。《学习风格量表》(科尔布,1976年),一份用于确定学习风格的自陈式问卷,填写了一次。数据分析表明,后测时对CAI的负面态度显著增强。所有四种学习风格类别的受试者在功能子量表上的负面态度在统计学上显著更强,同化者在创造力子量表以及总体态度上的负面态度也显著更强。本研究中对CAI越来越负面的态度可能反映了几个因素:对CAI软件的评估,以及受试者对CAI的期望未得到满足。