• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

太浩湖流域土壤修复处理的综合监测与评估

Integrated monitoring and assessment of soil restoration treatments in the Lake Tahoe Basin.

作者信息

Grismer M E, Schnurrenberger C, Arst R, Hogan M P

机构信息

Department of LAWR-Hydrology, UC Davis, Davis, CA 95616, USA.

出版信息

Environ Monit Assess. 2009 Mar;150(1-4):365-83. doi: 10.1007/s10661-008-0236-3. Epub 2008 May 16.

DOI:10.1007/s10661-008-0236-3
PMID:18483773
Abstract

Revegetation and soil restoration efforts, often associated with erosion control measures on disturbed soils, are rarely monitored or otherwise evaluated in terms of improved hydrologic, much less, ecologic function and longer term sustainability. As in many watersheds, sediment is a key parameter of concern in the Tahoe Basin, particularly fine sediments less than about ten microns. Numerous erosion control measures deployed in the Basin during the past several decades have under-performed, or simply failed after a few years and new soil restoration methods of erosion control are under investigation. We outline a comprehensive, integrated field-based evaluation and assessment of the hydrologic function associated with these soil restoration methods with the hypothesis that restoration of sustainable function will result in longer term erosion control benefits than that currently achieved with more commonly used surface treatment methods (e.g. straw/mulch covers and hydroseeding). The monitoring includes cover-point and ocular assessments of plant cover, species type and diversity; soil sampling for nutrient status; rainfall simulation measurement of infiltration and runoff rates; cone penetrometer measurements of soil compaction and thickness of mulch layer depths. Through multi-year hydrologic and vegetation monitoring at ten sites and 120 plots, we illustrate the results obtained from the integrated monitoring program and describe how it might guide future restoration efforts and monitoring assessments.

摘要

植被恢复和土壤修复工作通常与扰动土壤的侵蚀控制措施相关联,但很少就改善水文功能(更不用说生态功能和长期可持续性)进行监测或以其他方式评估。与许多流域一样,沉积物是太浩湖流域关注的关键参数,尤其是小于约十微米的细颗粒沉积物。在过去几十年里,该流域部署的众多侵蚀控制措施效果不佳,或者几年后就彻底失效,目前正在研究新的土壤修复侵蚀控制方法。我们概述了一项基于实地的全面综合评估,以评估与这些土壤修复方法相关的水文功能,并提出假设:恢复可持续功能将比目前更常用的地表处理方法(如秸秆/覆盖物覆盖和水力播种)带来更长期的侵蚀控制效益。监测内容包括对植物覆盖、物种类型和多样性进行覆盖点和目视评估;采集土壤样本以测定养分状况;通过降雨模拟测量入渗率和径流率;用圆锥贯入仪测量土壤压实度和覆盖层深度。通过在十个地点和120个地块进行多年的水文和植被监测,我们展示了综合监测计划所获得的结果,并描述了它如何指导未来的恢复工作和监测评估。

相似文献

1
Integrated monitoring and assessment of soil restoration treatments in the Lake Tahoe Basin.太浩湖流域土壤修复处理的综合监测与评估
Environ Monit Assess. 2009 Mar;150(1-4):365-83. doi: 10.1007/s10661-008-0236-3. Epub 2008 May 16.
2
Soil disturbance/restoration effects on stream sediment loading in the Tahoe Basin--detection monitoring.土壤扰动/恢复对太浩湖流域溪流沉积物负荷的影响——检测监测
Environ Monit Assess. 2014 Jul;186(7):4309-22. doi: 10.1007/s10661-014-3700-2. Epub 2014 Mar 20.
3
Effects of rainfall and terracing-vegetation combinations on water erosion in a loess hilly area, China.降雨和梯田-植被组合对中国黄土丘陵区水蚀的影响。
J Environ Manage. 2020 May 1;261:110247. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110247. Epub 2020 Mar 2.
4
Assessment of current and future land use/cover changes in soil erosion in the Rio da Prata basin (Brazil).评估里奥达普拉塔流域(巴西)土壤侵蚀中当前和未来的土地利用/覆被变化。
Sci Total Environ. 2022 Apr 20;818:151811. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.151811. Epub 2021 Nov 20.
5
Evaluation of water quality projects in the Lake Tahoe basin.太浩湖流域水质项目评估。
Environ Monit Assess. 2004 Jan;90(1-3):225-42. doi: 10.1023/b:emas.0000003591.52435.8d.
6
Quantifying the effect of ecological restoration on soil erosion in China's Loess Plateau region: an application of the MMF approach.量化生态恢复对中国黄土高原地区土壤侵蚀的影响:MMF 方法的应用。
Environ Manage. 2010 Mar;45(3):476-87. doi: 10.1007/s00267-009-9369-6. Epub 2009 Sep 16.
7
Spatial analysis of a large magnitude erosion event following a Sierran wildfire.内华达山脉野火后一次大规模侵蚀事件的空间分析。
J Environ Qual. 2007 May 25;36(4):1105-11. doi: 10.2134/jeq2006.0466. Print 2007 Jul-Aug.
8
Efficacy of orchard terrace measures to minimize water erosion caused by extreme rainfall in the hilly region of China: Long-term continuous in situ observations.果园台地措施对中国丘陵区极端降雨引起的水土流失的有效性:长期连续原位观测。
J Environ Manage. 2021 Jan 15;278(Pt 1):111537. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111537. Epub 2020 Oct 26.
9
Runoff erosion and nutrient depletion in five Mediterranean soils of NE Spain under different land use.西班牙东北部五种地中海土壤在不同土地利用方式下的径流侵蚀和养分耗竭
Sci Total Environ. 2003 Jun 20;309(1-3):213-24. doi: 10.1016/S0048-9697(03)00007-X.
10
Effect of vegetation utilization on runoff and sediment production on grain-for-green slopes in the wind-water erosion crisscross region.植被利用对风水蚀交错区退耕还林坡面径流和产沙的影响
Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao. 2018 Dec;29(12):3907-3916. doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.201812.014.

引用本文的文献

1
Spatial misallocation of ecological restoration and resulting economic costs in the red soil hilly region of China: a case study of the Zhuxi watershed.中国红壤丘陵区生态修复的空间错位及其经济代价:以竹溪流域为例。
Environ Monit Assess. 2020 Jan 20;192(2):125. doi: 10.1007/s10661-020-8076-x.
2
Developing restoration planting mixes for active ski slopes: a multi-site reference community approach.为活跃的滑雪道开发恢复种植混合物:一种多地点参考群落方法。
Environ Manage. 2012 Mar;49(3):636-48. doi: 10.1007/s00267-011-9797-y. Epub 2012 Jan 14.
3
Do postfire mulching treatments affect plant community recovery in California coastal sage scrub lands?

本文引用的文献

1
Evaluating the efficacy of wood shreds for mitigating erosion.评估木屑减轻侵蚀的功效。
J Environ Manage. 2009 Feb;90(2):779-85. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2008.01.006. Epub 2008 Feb 21.
2
Evaluation of water quality projects in the Lake Tahoe basin.太浩湖流域水质项目评估。
Environ Monit Assess. 2004 Jan;90(1-3):225-42. doi: 10.1023/b:emas.0000003591.52435.8d.
火灾后覆盖处理会影响加利福尼亚沿海莎草灌丛地的植物群落恢复吗?
Environ Manage. 2012 Jan;49(1):142-50. doi: 10.1007/s00267-011-9777-2. Epub 2011 Nov 1.