Molina Randy
USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, Forestry Sciences Laboratory, Corvallis, OR 97331, USA.
Mycol Res. 2008 Jun;112(Pt 6):613-38. doi: 10.1016/j.mycres.2007.12.005. Epub 2008 Jan 25.
In 1994, 234 fungal species were listed for protection under the Survey and Manage Programme (SMP) guidelines of the Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP), an area encompassing 9.7 Mha of federal land in the states of Washington, Oregon, and northern California. The fungal species were presumed rare, associated with late-successional old-growth forests, and in need of protection not afforded by the major elements of the NWFP, including a vast system of forest reserves. The SMP guidelines thus called for protecting known sites while gathering information through surveys to learn more about species rarity, distribution, habitat requirements, and persistence concerns. If new information revealed that a species was not rare, not associated with late-successional old-growth forests, or that other aspects of the NWFP guidelines provided for their persistence (e.g. adequate protection provided by forest reserves), the species could be removed from the programme. The first assemblage of known site records from fungal herbaria yielded approximately 3500 records for all listed species. After 12 y of survey the total number of records increased four-fold to approximately 14,400 records. Fifty-five percent of species were found at 20 or fewer sites and considered rare; 42% were found at ten or fewer sites. Over the life of the programme, 39 species were removed from the programme primarily because they were no longer considered rare; many were found at several hundred sites throughout the NWFP area. Mapped distributions of known sites varied among species. When viewed across species, however, known sites were well distributed throughout the NWFP area, thus indicating the importance of the entire NWFP area in maintaining this diverse array of fungi. The NWFP relies on a system of late-successional forest reserves to act as a coarse-filter conservation approach to provide protection for late-successional species. Ninety percent of fungal species had some portion of their known sites within reserves, but only 34% of total sites occurred within reserves. Thus, for the rarest species, applying a fine-filter conservation approach that protects known sites outside of reserves becomes an important aspect of species protection. The SMP became a costly and controversial aspect of the NWFP and underwent several administrative revisions including attempts to end the programme in 2004 and 2007. Regardless of costs and controversy, this conservation programme represents an unprecedented attempt to conserve rare fungal species at a regional scale. One of the more important lessons learned is the absolute need for professional mycologists to develop long-term partnerships with resource managers and other scientists, and apply mycological expertise to complex species and habitat conservation issues in an interdisciplinary setting.
1994年,根据《西北森林计划》(NWFP)的调查与管理计划(SMP)指南,234种真菌物种被列入保护名单。该计划覆盖华盛顿州、俄勒冈州和加利福尼亚州北部970万公顷的联邦土地。这些真菌物种被认为较为珍稀,与演替后期的原始森林相关,且需要《西北森林计划》的主要要素(包括庞大的森林保护区系统)所无法提供的保护。因此,SMP指南要求保护已知的栖息地,同时通过调查收集信息,以进一步了解物种的珍稀程度、分布范围、栖息地需求以及存续问题。如果新信息表明某个物种并不珍稀,与演替后期的原始森林无关,或者《西北森林计划》指南的其他方面能够确保其存续(例如森林保护区提供了充分保护),那么该物种可从该计划中移除。从真菌标本馆获取的首批已知栖息地记录汇总,为所有列入保护名单的物种提供了约3500条记录。经过12年的调查,记录总数增至四倍,约为14400条。55%的物种在20个或更少的栖息地被发现,被视为珍稀物种;42%的物种在10个或更少的栖息地被发现。在该计划实施期间,39个物种被从保护名单中移除,主要原因是它们不再被视为珍稀物种;在整个《西北森林计划》区域内的数百个栖息地都发现了许多此类物种。已知栖息地的分布图因物种而异。然而,从整体物种来看,已知栖息地在《西北森林计划》区域内分布广泛,这表明整个《西北森林计划》区域对于维持这一多样的真菌群落至关重要。《西北森林计划》依靠一个演替后期森林保护区系统,作为一种粗略筛选的保护方法,为演替后期物种提供保护。90%的真菌物种已知栖息地的一部分位于保护区内,但仅34%的栖息地总量位于保护区内。因此,对于最珍稀的物种而言,采用精细筛选的保护方法,保护保护区之外的已知栖息地,成为物种保护的一个重要方面。SMP成为《西北森林计划》中成本高昂且颇具争议的一个方面,并经历了几次行政修订,包括在2004年和2007年试图终止该计划。无论成本和争议如何,这个保护计划代表了在区域范围内保护珍稀真菌物种的一次前所未有的尝试。吸取的一个更为重要的教训是,专业真菌学家绝对有必要与资源管理者及其他科学家建立长期合作关系,并将真菌学专业知识应用于跨学科背景下复杂的物种和栖息地保护问题。