Suppr超能文献

日本人群中按教育水平划分的主要癌症部位的死亡率和发病率差异。

Differences in mortality and incidence for major sites of cancer by education level in a Japanese population.

作者信息

Nishi Nobuo, Sugiyama Hiromi, Hsu Wan-Ling, Soda Midori, Kasagi Fumiyoshi, Mabuchi Kiyohiko, Kodama Kazunori

机构信息

Department of Epidemiology, Hiroshima Laboratory, Radiation Effects Research Foundation, Hiroshima, Japan.

出版信息

Ann Epidemiol. 2008 Jul;18(7):584-91. doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2008.02.003. Epub 2008 May 16.

Abstract

PURPOSE

We aimed to examine the relationships between education and mortality and incidence for major sites of cancer in a Japanese population.

METHODS

Subjects were 32,883 respondents of questionnaire survey in 1978 with ages younger than 75 years. Cancer cases were ascertained through 2001, and causes of deaths were identified through 2003. Hazard ratios of deaths from cancer or developing cancers were compared among those with 9 or less, 10-12, and 13 years or more of education using Cox proportional hazard models.

RESULTS

As for cancer mortality of all sites combined, a statistically significantly decreasing trend was observed in age-adjusted models in both men and women, but no significant differences were observed in multivariate-adjusted (age, body mass index, smoking, radiation dose, and city) models. Among major cancer sites (stomach, colon/rectum, liver, lung, and female breast) examined, a significantly decreasing trend was observed for male liver cancer in a multivariate-adjusted model. As for incidence, a significantly decreasing trend was observed for cancer of all sites combined in men, and for male liver and prostate cancer and female lung cancer in a multivariate-adjusted model.

CONCLUSIONS

Educational differences in cancer incidence and mortality were generally rather small, but were significant for incidence for male all-site, male liver, prostate, and female lung cancers.

摘要

目的

我们旨在研究日本人群中教育程度与主要癌症部位的死亡率及发病率之间的关系。

方法

研究对象为1978年年龄小于75岁的32,883名问卷调查受访者。通过2001年确定癌症病例,并通过2003年确定死亡原因。使用Cox比例风险模型比较教育年限为9年及以下、10 - 12年和13年及以上人群的癌症死亡或患癌风险比。

结果

对于所有部位合并的癌症死亡率,在年龄调整模型中,男性和女性均观察到统计学上显著的下降趋势,但在多变量调整(年龄、体重指数、吸烟、辐射剂量和城市)模型中未观察到显著差异。在检查的主要癌症部位(胃、结肠/直肠、肝脏、肺和女性乳腺癌)中,多变量调整模型中男性肝癌观察到显著下降趋势。对于发病率,在多变量调整模型中,男性所有部位癌症、男性肝癌和前列腺癌以及女性肺癌观察到显著下降趋势。

结论

癌症发病率和死亡率的教育差异总体上较小,但男性所有部位、男性肝脏、前列腺和女性肺癌的发病率差异显著。

相似文献

1
Differences in mortality and incidence for major sites of cancer by education level in a Japanese population.
Ann Epidemiol. 2008 Jul;18(7):584-91. doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2008.02.003. Epub 2008 May 16.
3
Italian cancer figures--Report 2015: The burden of rare cancers in Italy.
Epidemiol Prev. 2016 Jan-Feb;40(1 Suppl 2):1-120. doi: 10.19191/EP16.1S2.P001.035.
4
Cancer mortality in the United States by education level and race.
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2007 Sep 19;99(18):1384-94. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djm127. Epub 2007 Sep 11.
5
Educational inequalities in cancer incidence and mortality in Lithuania: a record linkage study.
Cancer Epidemiol. 2012 Oct;36(5):e279-83. doi: 10.1016/j.canep.2012.05.009. Epub 2012 Jun 15.
9
Common cancers in the elderly.
Drugs Aging. 1998 Dec;13(6):467-78. doi: 10.2165/00002512-199813060-00005.
10
[Body mass index and cancer incidence:a prospective cohort study in northern China].
Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi. 2014 Mar;35(3):231-6.

本文引用的文献

1
Solid cancer incidence in atomic bomb survivors: 1958-1998.
Radiat Res. 2007 Jul;168(1):1-64. doi: 10.1667/RR0763.1.
2
Cancer incidence and incidence rates in Japan in 2000: Estimates based on data from 11 population-based cancer registries.
Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2006 Oct;36(10):668-75. doi: 10.1093/jjco/hyl084. Epub 2006 Aug 22.
3
Cervical and corpus cancer survival disparities by socioeconomic status in a metropolitan area of Japan.
Cancer Sci. 2006 Apr;97(4):283-91. doi: 10.1111/j.1349-7006.2006.00179.x.
5
Origins of socio-economic inequalities in cancer survival: a review.
Ann Oncol. 2006 Jan;17(1):5-19. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdj007. Epub 2005 Sep 2.
10
Cancer incidence, mortality from cancer and survival in men of different occupational classes.
Eur J Epidemiol. 2004;19(6):533-40. doi: 10.1023/b:ejep.0000032370.56821.71.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验