Uher Jana, Call Josep
Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Leipzig, Germany.
J Comp Psychol. 2008 May;122(2):204-12. doi: 10.1037/0735-7036.122.2.204.
We tested 6 chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes), 3 orangutans (Pongo pygmaeus), 4 bonobos (Pan paniscus), and 2 gorillas (Gorilla gorilla) in the reversed reward contingency task. Individuals were presented with pairs of quantities ranging between 0 and 6 food items. Prior to testing, some experienced apes had solved this task using 2 quantities while others were totally naïve. Experienced apes transferred their ability to multiple-novel pairs after 6 to 19 months had elapsed since their initial testing. Two out of 6 naïve apes (1 chimpanzee, 1 bonobo) solved the task--a proportion comparable to that of a previous study using 2 pairs of quantities. Their acquisition speed was also comparable to the successful subjects from that study. The ratio between quantities explained a large portion of the variance but affected naïve and experienced individuals differently. For smaller ratios, naïve individuals were well below 50% correct and experienced ones were well above 50%, yet both groups tended to converge toward 50% for larger ratios. Thus, some apes require no procedural modifications to overcome their strong bias for selecting the larger of 2 quantities.
我们在反向奖励 contingency 任务中测试了6只黑猩猩(Pan troglodytes)、3只猩猩(Pongo pygmaeus)、4只倭黑猩猩(Pan paniscus)和2只大猩猩(Gorilla gorilla)。给个体呈现数量在0到6个食物项目之间的成对数量。在测试之前,一些有经验的猿类已经使用两种数量解决了这个任务,而其他的则完全没有经验。自最初测试以来,经过6到19个月后,有经验的猿类将它们的能力转移到了多个新的成对数量上。6只无经验的猿类中有2只(1只黑猩猩,1只倭黑猩猩)解决了这个任务——这一比例与之前使用两对数量的研究相当。它们的习得速度也与该研究中的成功受试者相当。数量之间的比例解释了很大一部分方差,但对无经验和有经验的个体影响不同。对于较小的比例,无经验的个体正确率远低于50%,有经验的个体则远高于50%,但对于较大的比例,两组都倾向于接近50%。因此,一些猿类不需要程序上的修改来克服它们在选择两个数量中较大者时的强烈偏好。