Karg Katja, Schmelz Martin, Call Josep, Tomasello Michael
Department of Psychology, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Leipzig, Germany.
School of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of St Andrews, St Andrews, UK.
Anim Cogn. 2016 May;19(3):555-64. doi: 10.1007/s10071-016-0956-7. Epub 2016 Feb 6.
Although chimpanzees understand what others may see, it is unclear whether they understand how others see things (Level 2 perspective-taking). We investigated whether chimpanzees can predict the behavior of a conspecific which is holding a mistaken perspective that differs from their own. The subject competed with a conspecific over two food sticks. While the subject could see that both were the same size, to the competitor one appeared bigger than the other. In a previously established game, the competitor chose one stick in private first and the subject chose thereafter, without knowing which of the sticks was gone. Chimpanzees and 6-year-old children chose the 'riskier' stick (that looked bigger to the competitor) significantly less in the game than in a nonsocial control. Children chose randomly in the control, thus showing Level 2 perspective-taking skills; in contrast, chimpanzees had a preference for the 'riskier' stick here, rendering it possible that they attributed their own preference to the competitor to predict her choice. We thus run a follow-up in which chimpanzees did not have a preference in the control. Now, they also chose randomly in the game. We conclude that chimpanzees solved the task by attributing their own preference to the other, while children truly understood the other's mistaken perspective.
虽然黑猩猩明白其他个体可能看到什么,但它们是否理解其他个体如何看待事物(二级视角采择)尚不清楚。我们调查了黑猩猩是否能够预测持有与自己不同错误视角的同种个体的行为。实验对象与一个同种个体竞争两根食物棒。虽然实验对象能看到两根食物棒大小相同,但对竞争者来说,其中一根看起来比另一根更大。在之前设定的游戏中,竞争者先私下选择一根食物棒,然后实验对象在不知道哪根食物棒被拿走的情况下进行选择。黑猩猩和6岁儿童在游戏中选择“风险更高”的食物棒(对竞争者来说看起来更大的那根)的次数明显少于非社交控制实验。儿童在控制实验中随机选择,从而表现出二级视角采择能力;相比之下,黑猩猩在这里更倾向于选择“风险更高”的食物棒,这表明它们可能将自己的偏好归因于竞争者来预测其选择。因此,我们进行了一项后续实验,在控制实验中黑猩猩没有偏好。现在,它们在游戏中也随机选择。我们得出结论,黑猩猩通过将自己的偏好归因于其他个体来解决任务,而儿童真正理解了其他个体的错误视角。