Suppr超能文献

与社区中的独立住房相比的庇护性住房。

Sheltered housing compared to independent housing in the community.

作者信息

van Bilsen Pascalle M A, Hamers Jan P H, Groot Wim, Spreeuwenberg Cor

机构信息

School for Public Health and Primary Care, Department of Health Organization, Policy and Economics, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Scand J Caring Sci. 2008 Jun;22(2):265-74. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-6712.2007.00529.x.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

With elderly people desiring to live independently as long as possible, traditional homes for the elderly are increasingly being transformed into sheltered accommodations. In order to assess the importance of housing for frail elderly people, elderly people at risk for institutionalization were studied in two living conditions: sheltered accommodation and living independently in the community.

METHODS

A total of 317 elderly people at risk for institutionalization [91 men and 240 women, mean age = 83.3 (SD = 6.0)] were interviewed using a structured questionnaire with questions regarding home care and social service use, quality of life, subjective well-being, life satisfaction, autonomy, functional status, feelings of insecurity and loneliness.

RESULTS

Exactly 56.5% of the respondents were living in sheltered accommodation (n = 179) and 43.5% (n = 138) were living in regular houses. Although both groups were similar in demographic details and functional status, those in sheltered accommodation had a higher perceived autonomy, sense of security and quality of life. No differences were found with regard to subjective well-being or feelings of loneliness. Elderly people in regular houses needed more hours of housekeeping assistance. Those in sheltered accommodation participated more frequently in services like social activities and social restaurants, but made less use of day care facilities.

CONCLUSIONS

Affordable, decent and suitable noninstitutional housing with service provision play a vital role in the lives of elderly people. Compared with independent living in the community, sheltered accommodations provide added value. Sheltered housing should therefore be an integral part of long-term care policy.

摘要

背景

随着老年人希望尽可能长时间地独立生活,传统养老院正越来越多地转变为庇护性住所。为了评估住房对体弱老年人的重要性,对有机构化风险的老年人在两种生活状况下进行了研究:庇护性住所和社区独立生活。

方法

使用结构化问卷对总共317名有机构化风险的老年人[91名男性和240名女性,平均年龄 = 83.3(标准差 = 6.0)]进行了访谈,问卷涉及家庭护理和社会服务使用情况、生活质量、主观幸福感、生活满意度、自主性、功能状况、不安全感和孤独感。

结果

确切地说,56.5%的受访者居住在庇护性住所(n = 179),43.5%(n = 138)居住在普通房屋。尽管两组在人口统计学细节和功能状况方面相似,但居住在庇护性住所的人有更高的自主感、安全感和生活质量。在主观幸福感或孤独感方面未发现差异。居住在普通房屋的老年人需要更多小时的家务协助。居住在庇护性住所的人更频繁地参与社交活动和社会餐馆等服务,但较少使用日托设施。

结论

提供服务的经济适用、体面且合适的非机构性住房在老年人生活中起着至关重要的作用。与社区独立生活相比,庇护性住所有额外价值。因此,庇护性住房应成为长期护理政策的一个组成部分。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验