Reeves R L
J Clin Pharmacol. 1977 May-Jun;17(5-6):319-23. doi: 10.1002/j.1552-4604.1977.tb04611.x.
The safety and efficacy of 0.25 mg triazolam were compared to those of 15 mg flurazepam and placebo in 41 geriatric outpatients suffering from insomnia. The patients were randomly assigned to one of the three treatment groups. The medication was taken at bedtime for 28 days. Tolerance development was also studied. Triazolam was found to be significantly better than placebo in how much the medication helped the patients sleep, in sleep onset, in duration of sleep, number of nighttime awakenings, in quality (depth) of sleep, and in feeling of restfulness in the morning. Triazolam was significantly better than flurazepam in duration of sleep and was rated higher than flurazepam in all other variables. Flurazepam was significantly better than placebo in only two variables--onset of sleep and quality (depth) of sleep. Side effects were reported in each treatment group, and one patient on placebo discontinued because of side effects. There was no decrease in hypnotic effect over this four-week period, therefore, no evidence of tolerance development on either of the active compounds. Both active compounds provided the same amount of relief from insomnia after four weeks as they had after one week. Laboratory analyses and poststudy physical examinations showed no deleterious effects over the four-week period.
在41名患有失眠症的老年门诊患者中,对0.25毫克三唑仑的安全性和有效性与15毫克氟西泮及安慰剂进行了比较。患者被随机分配到三个治疗组之一。药物在睡前服用,持续28天。还对耐受性发展进行了研究。结果发现,在药物对患者睡眠的帮助程度、入睡情况、睡眠时间、夜间觉醒次数、睡眠质量(深度)以及早晨的宁静感方面,三唑仑明显优于安慰剂。在睡眠时间方面,三唑仑明显优于氟西泮,在所有其他变量方面的评分也高于氟西泮。氟西泮仅在入睡和睡眠质量(深度)这两个变量上明显优于安慰剂。每个治疗组均报告有副作用,一名服用安慰剂的患者因副作用而停药。在这四周期间催眠效果没有下降,因此,没有证据表明两种活性化合物出现耐受性。四周后,两种活性化合物缓解失眠的程度与一周后相同。实验室分析和研究后的体格检查显示,在四周期间没有有害影响。