Yakovlev Igor A, Asante Daniel K A, Fossdal Carl Gunnar, Partanen Jouni, Junttila Olavi, Johnsen Oystein
The Norwegian Forest and Landscape Institute, Høgskoleveien 8, 1432, As, Norway.
Planta. 2008 Aug;228(3):459-72. doi: 10.1007/s00425-008-0750-0. Epub 2008 May 21.
Cold deacclimation and preparation to flushing likely requires rehydration of meristems. Therefore, water stress related genes, such as dehydrins (DHN), might play an important role in providing protection during winter dormancy, deacclimation and bud burst timing processes. Here we report the sequence analysis of several Norway spruce DHN identified in late and early flushing suppressive subtraction hybridization cDNA libraries and in our Norway spruce EST database. We obtained 15 cDNAs, representing eight genes from three distinct types of DHN, and studied differential expression of these genes before and during bud burst in spring, using qRT-PCR. We found the visible reduction in transcript level of most DHN towards the bud burst, supported by a significant down-regulation of the DHN in needles during experimental induction of bud burst applied at three time points during autumn in Norway spruce grafts. For most of the DHN transcripts, their expression levels in late-flushing spruces were significantly higher than in the early flushing ones at the same calendar dates but were remarkably similar at the same bud developmental stage. From our results we may conclude that the difference between the early and the late families is in timing of the molecular processes leading to bud burst due to differences in their response to the increasing temperature in the spring. They are induced much earlier in the early flushing families.
低温驯化解除及准备进入抽梢期可能需要分生组织重新水化。因此,与水分胁迫相关的基因,如脱水素(DHN),可能在冬季休眠、驯化解除及芽萌发时间进程中发挥重要的保护作用。在此,我们报告了在晚期和早期抑制性消减杂交cDNA文库以及挪威云杉EST数据库中鉴定出的几个挪威云杉DHN的序列分析结果。我们获得了15个cDNA,代表来自三种不同类型DHN的8个基因,并使用qRT-PCR研究了这些基因在春季芽萌发之前及期间的差异表达。我们发现,随着芽萌发,大多数DHN的转录水平明显降低,挪威云杉嫁接苗在秋季三个时间点进行芽萌发实验诱导时,针叶中DHN显著下调也支持了这一点。对于大多数DHN转录本,在相同日历日期,它们在晚抽梢云杉中的表达水平显著高于早抽梢云杉,但在相同芽发育阶段则非常相似。从我们的结果可以得出结论,早抽梢和晚抽梢类群之间的差异在于,由于它们对春季温度升高的反应不同,导致芽萌发的分子过程的时间不同。早抽梢类群中它们被诱导的时间要早得多。