Rota-Stabelli Omar, Telford Maximilian J
Research Department of Genetics, Evolution and Environment, University College London, Darwin Building, Gower Street, London WC1E 6BT, UK.
Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2008 Jul;48(1):103-11. doi: 10.1016/j.ympev.2008.03.033. Epub 2008 Apr 4.
The choice of an appropriate outgroup is a fundamental prerequisite when the difference between two conflicting phylogenetic hypotheses depends on the position of the root. This is the case for the myriapods that may group either with Pancrustacea forming a clade called Mandibulata, in accordance with morphological characters, or with chelicerates to form Myriochelata (also called Paradoxopoda) as has recently been proposed by mitochondrial and ribosomal RNA gene phylogenies. In order to understand the impact that outgroup choice may have on phylogenetic reconstruction, we have investigated compositional heterogeneity and genetic distance in mtDNA sequences of several different outgroups to the arthropods, selected from deuterostomes, lophotrochozoans and ecdysozoans, and have used them to root a phylogenetically balanced and compositionarily homogeneous arthropod dataset. Results indicate that some outgroups, in particular from lophotrochozoans, nematodes and an onychophoran have G+C content and strand specific biases which are very different from those of arthropods, suggesting that the use of such outgroups may interfere with the stationarity of the model to create a random outgroup effect. We suggest a multi criterion approach for the selection of optimal outgroup species on the basis of (1) low substitution rate, (2) ingroup-like G+C composition, (3) a new strand bias estimator called the skew index, (4) the ability of the outgroup to avoid a "random branching effect" and (5) phylogenetic proximity to arthropods. Inference of phylogeny using various outgroups shows that use of phylogenetically distant and compositionally distinct lophotrochozoans as outgroups strongly supports Myriochelata and use of more closely related, but fast evolving nematodes supports Mandibulata. A dataset comprising multiple ecdysozoan outgroups also supports Mandibulata, unless the compositionally distant Onychophora are included. A group of the best outgroups selected according to our multi criteria selection, and including the most closely related, least genetically distant and most compositionally similar outgroup, a priapulid worm, supports Mandibulata. We conclude that support for the Myriochelata hypothesis from mitochondrial sequences may depend on the nature of the outgroup sequences rather than a true phylogenetic signal. Finally, we advocate a careful analysis and an objective choice of outgroup when dealing with derived sequences, such as mitochondrial genomes.
当两个相互冲突的系统发育假说之间的差异取决于根的位置时,选择合适的外类群是一个基本前提。多足动物就是这种情况,根据形态特征,它们可能与泛甲壳动物归为一类,形成一个名为有颚类的进化枝,或者如线粒体和核糖体RNA基因系统发育最近所提出的,与螯肢动物归为一类,形成多螯类(也称为奇虾类)。为了了解外类群选择可能对系统发育重建产生的影响,我们研究了从后口动物、冠轮动物和蜕皮动物中选出的几种不同节肢动物外类群的线粒体DNA序列中的组成异质性和遗传距离,并使用它们来确定一个系统发育平衡且组成均匀的节肢动物数据集的根。结果表明,一些外类群,特别是来自冠轮动物、线虫和一种栉蚕的外类群,其G+C含量和链特异性偏差与节肢动物的非常不同,这表明使用这些外类群可能会干扰模型的平稳性,从而产生随机外类群效应。我们建议采用一种多标准方法来选择最佳外类群物种,该方法基于以下几点:(1)低替换率;(2)类似内类群的G+C组成;(3)一种名为偏斜指数的新的链偏差估计器;(4)外类群避免“随机分支效应”的能力;(5)与节肢动物的系统发育接近度。使用各种外类群进行系统发育推断表明,使用系统发育距离远且组成不同的冠轮动物作为外类群强烈支持多螯类,而使用关系更密切但进化迅速的线虫则支持有颚类。一个包含多个蜕皮动物外类群的数据集也支持有颚类,除非包含组成不同的栉蚕。根据我们的多标准选择选出的一组最佳外类群,包括关系最密切、遗传距离最小且组成最相似的外类群——一种鳃曳虫,支持有颚类。我们得出结论,线粒体序列对多螯类假说的支持可能取决于外类群序列的性质,而不是真正的系统发育信号。最后,我们主张在处理如线粒体基因组等衍生序列时,要对外类群进行仔细分析并做出客观选择。