Boore J L, Collins T M, Stanton D, Daehler L L, Brown W M
Department of Biology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor 48109-1048, USA.
Nature. 1995 Jul 13;376(6536):163-5. doi: 10.1038/376163a0.
The origins of arthropods and the phylogenetic relationships among their three major living groups (atelocerates, crustaceans and chelicerates) are vigorously contended. To help resolve this, we determined mitochondrial gene arrangements for a chelicerate, a myriapod, two crustaceans, an onychophoran, a mollusc and an annelid, and compared them with published gene orders of other species. The result strongly supports the monophyly of Arthropoda and of Mandibulata (atelocerates plus crustaceans) and refutes the Uniramia (atelocerates plus onychophorans). Gene arrangement comparisons are emerging as a powerful new tool for resolving ancient phylogenetic relationships.
节肢动物的起源以及它们三大主要现存类群(无角亚目、甲壳类动物和螯肢亚门)之间的系统发育关系存在激烈争论。为了帮助解决这一问题,我们确定了一种螯肢亚门动物、一种多足纲动物、两种甲壳类动物、一种有爪动物、一种软体动物和一种环节动物的线粒体基因排列,并将它们与已发表的其他物种的基因顺序进行了比较。结果有力地支持了节肢动物门和有颚类(无角亚目加甲壳类动物)的单系性,并反驳了单枝动物亚门(无角亚目加有爪动物)。基因排列比较正成为解决古老系统发育关系问题的一种强大新工具。