Kressel Gaby, Trunz Birgit, Bub Achim, Hülsmann Olaf, Wolters Maike, Lichtinghagen Ralf, Stichtenoth Dirk O, Hahn Andreas
Nutrition Physiology and Human Nutrition Unit, Institute of Food Science, Leibniz University of Hannover, Hannover, Germany.
Atherosclerosis. 2009 Jan;202(1):263-71. doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2008.04.012. Epub 2008 Apr 20.
In recent years high sensitive C-reactive protein (hsCRP), soluble vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 (sVCAM-1), soluble intercellular cell adhesion molecule-1 (sICAM-1), fibrinogen, and plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1) were recognized as risk factors for cardiovascular disease (CVD). The aim of the present study was to investigate the relationship between these vascular and systemic markers of low-grade inflammation and traditional risk factors, the metabolic syndrome (MetS) or insulin resistance (IR).
In 137 adults (41-78 years) with at least 2 risk factors for atherosclerosis the following parameters were determined: hsCRP, sVCAM-1, sICAM-1, PAI-1, fibrinogen, waist circumference (WC), blood pressure, Body Mass Index (BMI), fasting serum glucose (FSG), insulin, triglycerides (TG), total cholesterol (TC), LDL, and HDL. The presence or absence of MetS according to the AHA/NHLBI Scientific Statement criteria was assessed. IR was defined using the homeostasis model (HOMA-IR). Subjects with MetS had significantly higher values of hsCRP, sICAM-1, sVCAM-1, PAI-1, fibrinogen (each P<0.05) and lower HDL-levels (P<0.05) compared with subjects without MetS. Similar results were found using HOMA-IR-quartiles. Subjects in the bottom quartile (HOMA-IR<or=1.32) had significantly lower levels of hsCRP, sVCAM-1, sICAM-1, and PAI-1 (each P<0.05) than subjects in the top quartile (HOMA-IR>or=5.03). HDL was significantly higher (P<0.05) in subjects in the lowest quartile versus those in the highest quartile. Incidentally we found no significant differences in total and LDL cholesterol among MetS, HOMA, and traditional CVD risk factor groups, respectively.
Systemic and vascular markers of inflammation showed significant associations with IR and the MetS and may be incorporated into traditional CVD risk prediction models. Such models should be established and validated in forthcoming large scale prospective studies on CVD risk.
近年来,高敏C反应蛋白(hsCRP)、可溶性血管细胞黏附分子-1(sVCAM-1)、可溶性细胞间黏附分子-1(sICAM-1)、纤维蛋白原和纤溶酶原激活物抑制剂-1(PAI-1)被认为是心血管疾病(CVD)的危险因素。本研究旨在探讨这些低度炎症的血管和全身标志物与传统危险因素、代谢综合征(MetS)或胰岛素抵抗(IR)之间的关系。
对137名年龄在41 - 78岁、至少有2项动脉粥样硬化危险因素的成年人测定了以下参数:hsCRP、sVCAM-1、sICAM-1、PAI-1、纤维蛋白原、腰围(WC)、血压、体重指数(BMI)、空腹血清葡萄糖(FSG)、胰岛素、甘油三酯(TG)、总胆固醇(TC)、低密度脂蛋白(LDL)和高密度脂蛋白(HDL)。根据美国心脏协会/美国国立心肺血液研究所科学声明标准评估MetS的存在与否。使用稳态模型(HOMA-IR)定义IR。与无MetS的受试者相比,患有MetS的受试者hsCRP、sICAM-1、sVCAM-1、PAI-1、纤维蛋白原的值显著更高(均P<0.05),HDL水平更低(P<0.05)。使用HOMA-IR四分位数也发现了类似结果。四分位数最低组(HOMA-IR≤1.32)的受试者hsCRP、sVCAM-1、sICAM-1和PAI-1水平(均P<0.05)显著低于四分位数最高组(HOMA-IR≥5.03)的受试者。最低四分位数组的受试者HDL显著高于最高四分位数组(P<0.05)。顺便提及,我们发现MetS组、HOMA组和传统CVD危险因素组之间的总胆固醇和LDL胆固醇无显著差异。
炎症的全身和血管标志物与IR和MetS显著相关,可纳入传统CVD风险预测模型。此类模型应在即将开展的关于CVD风险的大规模前瞻性研究中建立并验证。