Fox Emily M, Davis Rebecca J, Shupnik Margaret A
Department of Pharmacology, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, VA 22903, United States.
Steroids. 2008 Oct;73(11):1039-51. doi: 10.1016/j.steroids.2008.04.006. Epub 2008 Apr 20.
The role of estrogen exposure in breast cancer risk is well-documented, and both estrogen synthesis and actions through the estrogen receptor (ER) have been targeted by therapies to control hormone-dependent breast cancer. The discovery of a second ER form and its therapeutic implications sparked great interest. Both the original ERalpha and the more recently identified ERbeta subtypes bind and respond similarly to many physiological and pharmacological ligands. However, differences in phytoestrogen binding have been noted, and subtype-specific ligands have been developed. Cell-based assays show that ERbeta and its variants are generally less active on gene transcription than ERalpha, and may influence ERalpha activity; however, both gene- and cell-specific responses occur, and nongenomic activities are less well explored. Specific ligands, and methods to disrupt or eliminate receptor subtype expression in animal and cell models, demonstrate that the ERs have both overlapping and distinct biological functions. Overall, in cell-based studies, ERalpha appears to play a predominant role in cell proliferation, and ERbeta is suggested to be antiproliferative. The potential for distinct populations of breast tumors to be identified based on ER subtype expression, and to exhibit distinct clinical behaviors, is of greatest interest. Several studies suggest that the majority of ER-positive tumors contain both subtypes, but that some tumors contain only ERbeta and may have distinct clinical behaviors and responses. Expression of ERbeta together with ERalpha favors positive responses to endocrine therapy in most studies, and additional studies to determine if the addition of ERbeta to ERalpha as a tumor marker is of clinical benefit are warranted. In contrast, the positive association between ERbeta and HER2 expression in high-grade ERalpha-negative breast cancer does not favor positive responses to endocrine therapy. Expression of ERbeta in specific clinical subpopulations, and the potential for therapies targeting ERbeta specifically, is discussed.
雌激素暴露在乳腺癌风险中的作用已有充分记录,雌激素合成以及通过雌激素受体(ER)发挥的作用均已成为控制激素依赖性乳腺癌治疗的靶点。第二种ER形式的发现及其治疗意义引发了极大关注。最初的ERα和最近鉴定出的ERβ亚型对许多生理和药理配体的结合及反应相似。然而,已注意到它们在植物雌激素结合方面存在差异,并且已开发出亚型特异性配体。基于细胞的分析表明,ERβ及其变体在基因转录方面通常比ERα活性低,并且可能影响ERα活性;然而,基因和细胞特异性反应均会发生,且非基因组活性的研究较少。特异性配体以及在动物和细胞模型中破坏或消除受体亚型表达的方法表明,ER具有重叠且独特的生物学功能。总体而言,在基于细胞的研究中,ERα似乎在细胞增殖中起主要作用,而ERβ被认为具有抗增殖作用。基于ER亚型表达识别不同人群的乳腺肿瘤并表现出不同临床行为的可能性备受关注。多项研究表明,大多数ER阳性肿瘤同时包含这两种亚型,但有些肿瘤仅含有ERβ,可能具有不同的临床行为和反应。在大多数研究中,ERβ与ERα共同表达有利于对内分泌治疗产生阳性反应,因此有必要进行更多研究以确定将ERβ作为肿瘤标志物添加到ERα中是否具有临床益处。相比之下,在高级别ERα阴性乳腺癌中,ERβ与HER2表达之间的正相关不利于对内分泌治疗产生阳性反应。本文讨论了ERβ在特定临床亚群中的表达以及针对ERβ进行特异性治疗的潜力。