Farbood Arash, Shahbazi Shahrbanoo
Department of Anesthesiology, Medical School, Shiraz University of Medical Science, Shiraz, Iran.
J Clin Anesth. 2008 May;20(3):196-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2007.10.010.
To compare the effect of the Esmarch bandage and limb elevation techniques in quality of painlessness of intravenous (IV) regional anesthesia.
Double-blinded, controlled, randomized clinical trial.
Operating room of university hospital.
70 ASA physical status capital I, Ukrainian and capital PE, Cyrillic patients who were scheduled for repair of upper extremity soft-tissue injuries.
Patients were randomized for exsanguination of their upper extremities either by Esmarch bandage (Esmarch group) or by limb elevation (elevation group) to 90 degrees for about 5 minutes.
Preoperative and intraoperative pain intensities were evaluated by verbal response scale. The intensity of pain and need for IV sedative and analgesic medications were compared in both groups by Fisher's exact and chi2 tests.
There was no significant statistical difference between the pain intensity data of two groups either before or after starting the surgery. The need for IV supplemental drugs for pain relief was similar in both groups.
The limb elevation technique, while producing less discomfort for patients, can be as effective as the Esmarch bandage in limb exsanguination during IV regional anesthesia.
比较埃斯马赫绷带和肢体抬高技术在静脉区域麻醉无痛质量方面的效果。
双盲、对照、随机临床试验。
大学医院手术室。
70例美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)身体状况为I级、乌克兰籍且为西里尔文的患者,计划进行上肢软组织损伤修复手术。
患者被随机分为两组,分别通过埃斯马赫绷带(埃斯马赫组)或肢体抬高(抬高组)将上肢放血至90度约5分钟。
术前和术中疼痛强度通过言语反应量表进行评估。两组间疼痛强度以及静脉镇静和镇痛药物的需求通过费舍尔精确检验和卡方检验进行比较。
手术开始前或开始后,两组的疼痛强度数据均无显著统计学差异。两组用于缓解疼痛的静脉补充药物需求相似。
肢体抬高技术虽然给患者带来的不适较少,但在静脉区域麻醉肢体放血方面与埃斯马赫绷带一样有效。