Sørensen J B, Kragstrup J, Skovgaard T, Puggaard L
Centre of Applied and Clinical Exercise Sciences, Institute of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics, University of Southern Denmark, Odense M, Denmark.
Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2008 Jun;18(3):288-97. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0838.2008.00811.x.
The aim of this study was to compare short- (0-4 months) and long-term (0-10 months) effects of high-intensive Exercise on Prescription (EoP) intervention (counseling and supervised exercise) implemented in primary healthcare in a number of Danish counties with a low-intensive intervention (counseling) using maximal oxygen uptake (VO(2max)) as the primary outcome. The study was conducted as a randomized trial in 2005-2006 with a high and a low-intensive group. All the patients referred to the EoP scheme by their GP in the counties of Vejle and Ribe, Denmark, were eligible for the trial. The high-intensive EoP group received 4 months of group-based supervised training and attended five motivational counseling sessions. The low-intensive group only attended four motivational counseling sessions. Three hundred and twenty-seven patients entered the EoP scheme, and 52 (16%) volunteered for the randomized trial. No short- or long-term differences were found between the high and the low-intensive groups for VO(2max) (short-term 95% CI -1.1; 4.4 mL O(2)/(kg min), long-term 95% CI -1.6 to 2.1). The present study did not demonstrate any significant clinical outcome for the high-intensive EoP intervention as opposed to the low-intensive intervention.
本研究旨在比较高强度运动处方干预(咨询与监督下的运动)与低强度干预(咨询)在丹麦若干县的初级医疗保健中实施时,对最大摄氧量(VO₂max)这一主要结局指标产生的短期(0 - 4个月)和长期(0 - 10个月)影响。该研究于2005 - 2006年作为一项随机试验进行,分为高强度组和低强度组。丹麦菲英岛和 Ribe 县所有由全科医生转介至运动处方计划的患者均符合试验条件。高强度运动处方组接受了4个月的基于小组的监督训练,并参加了五次动机咨询会议。低强度组仅参加了四次动机咨询会议。327名患者进入运动处方计划,其中52名(16%)自愿参加随机试验。高强度组和低强度组在VO₂max方面未发现短期或长期差异(短期95%CI -1.1;4.4 mL O₂/(kg·min),长期95%CI -1.6至2.1)。与低强度干预相比,本研究未证明高强度运动处方干预有任何显著的临床结局。