Tsuchihashi Daisuke, Abe Takaya, Komaba Hirotaka, Fujii Hideki, Hamada Yasuhiro, Nii-Kono Tomoko, Tanaka Motoko, Fukagawa Masafumi
Division of Nephrology and Dialysis Center, Kobe University School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan.
Ther Apher Dial. 2008 Jun;12(3):226-31. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-9987.2008.00578.x.
Hepcidin has recently been recognized as a hormone essential to the negative regulation of iron. Synthesis of hepcidin is increased by iron overload or inflammation, and decreased by iron deficiency, anemia and erythropoietin. Dialysis patients frequently suffer the effects of both hepcidin increasing and decreasing factors. In this study, we investigated, for the first time, pro-hepcidin in dialysis patients while minimizing or manipulating these factors. We measured the serum pro-hepcidin in 23 hemodialysis patients without inflammation (the HD group) and 10 age-matched healthy volunteers. Those patients in the HD group were assigned to an iron-deficiency group (the ID group) or a non-iron deficiency subgroup (non-ID group). The HD group was followed up for two months. Iron therapy was performed in the ID group during the follow-up period. At the end of this time we evaluated the influence of iron therapy. Pro-hepcidin was similar in the HD groups and the healthy controls (295.1 [241.9, 413.7] vs. 301.7 [280.5, 383.5] ng/mL; not significant) despite the presence of hepcidin-decreasing factors. Pro-hepcidin in the ID group was significantly lower than in the non-ID group (262.6 [233.1, 295.1] vs. 359.2 [282.3, 446.5] ng/mL; P < 0.05). In patients newly acquiring ID during follow-up without iron supplementation, pro-hepcidin fell significantly (from 444.7 [389.4, 470.1] to 299.8 [233.4, 330.4] ng/mL; P < 0.05). Pro-hepcidin also showed an increase after ID was treated with iron administration (from 246.9 [205.5, 329.1] to 344.6 [290.1, 377.9] ng/mL; not significant). Pro-hepcidin could serve as a marker for functional iron deficiency and disordered iron utilization in HD. Underlying mechanisms and improvements in measurement techniques will require additional investigation.
近年来,铁调素已被公认为是铁负调节所必需的一种激素。铁过载或炎症会增加铁调素的合成,而缺铁、贫血和促红细胞生成素则会使其合成减少。透析患者经常受到铁调素增加和减少因素的双重影响。在本研究中,我们首次在尽量减少或控制这些因素的情况下,对透析患者的前铁调素进行了研究。我们测量了23名无炎症的血液透析患者(HD组)和10名年龄匹配的健康志愿者的血清前铁调素。HD组的患者被分为缺铁组(ID组)和非缺铁亚组(非ID组)。HD组随访两个月。随访期间对ID组进行了铁剂治疗。在这个时间段结束时,我们评估了铁剂治疗的影响。尽管存在降低铁调素的因素,但HD组和健康对照组的前铁调素水平相似(295.1 [241.9, 413.7] vs. 301.7 [280.5, 383.5] ng/mL;无显著差异)。ID组的前铁调素水平显著低于非ID组(262.6 [233.1, 295.1] vs. 359.2 [282.3, 446.5] ng/mL;P < 0.05)。在随访期间新出现缺铁且未补充铁剂的患者中,前铁调素显著下降(从444.7 [389.4, 470.1]降至299.8 [233.4, 330.4] ng/mL;P < 0.05)。在对缺铁进行铁剂治疗后,前铁调素也有所升高(从