James Lisa M, Taylor Jeanette
Department of Psychology, Florida State University, Florida 32306-1270, USA.
Br J Clin Psychol. 2008 Nov;47(Pt 4):361-80. doi: 10.1348/014466508X299691. Epub 2008 May 23.
Researchers have turned to dimensional models of psychopathology as a means of explaining robust patterns of comorbidity. A hierarchical model consisting of internalizing and externalizing dimensions has been a useful approach to understanding comorbidity among some mental disorders, although a limited number of disorders have been examined within this framework. The objective of the present study is to determine how borderline personality disorder fits into this framework.
Dimensional measures of nine psychiatric disorders were used in a confirmatory factors analysis to compare five models of comorbidity in 1,197 members (N=541 women) of a population-based sample. Symptom composites were derived from the Michigan Composite International Diagnostic Interview and the International Personality Disorders Examination Questionnaire.
Five models were fit to dimensional indicators of nine disorders. A model in which borderline personality disorder served as a multidimensional indicator of the externalizing factor and the anxious-misery subfactor of internalizing disorders provided the best fit to the data in the whole sample and in men. For women, this model also fit well but an alternative model in which borderline personality disorder served only as an indicator of the anxious-misery subfactor of internalizing disorders fit equally well.
The present study demonstrates the utility of the internalizing/externalizing framework for characterizing personality disorders as well as Axis I disorders. Future work should explore how other personality disorders fit into this framework.
研究人员已转向精神病理学的维度模型,以此作为解释共病的稳健模式的一种手段。由内化和外化维度组成的层次模型一直是理解某些精神障碍中共病情况的一种有用方法,尽管在此框架内仅研究了有限数量的障碍。本研究的目的是确定边缘型人格障碍如何融入该框架。
在一项验证性因素分析中,使用了九种精神障碍的维度测量方法,以比较来自一个基于人群的样本中的1197名成员(N = 541名女性)的五种共病模型。症状组合源自密歇根综合国际诊断访谈和国际人格障碍检查问卷。
五种模型与九种障碍的维度指标相拟合。在一个模型中,边缘型人格障碍作为外化因素和内化障碍的焦虑 - 痛苦子因素的多维指标,该模型在整个样本和男性中对数据的拟合效果最佳。对于女性,该模型拟合良好,但另一种模型(其中边缘型人格障碍仅作为内化障碍的焦虑 - 痛苦子因素的指标)拟合效果同样良好。
本研究证明了内化/外化框架在表征人格障碍以及轴I障碍方面的效用。未来的工作应探索其他人格障碍如何融入该框架。