Bremer Edwin, de Bruyn Marco, Samplonius Douwe F, Bijma Theo, ten Cate Bram, de Leij Lou F M H, Helfrich Wijnand
Laboratory for Tumor Immunology, Section Medical Biology, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University Medical Center Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, Groningen, The Netherlands.
J Mol Med (Berl). 2008 Aug;86(8):909-24. doi: 10.1007/s00109-008-0348-9. Epub 2008 May 27.
Previously, we have shown that epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-selective delivery of soluble tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (sTRAIL), by genetic fusion to antibody fragment scFv425, enhances the tumor-selective pro-apoptotic activity of sTRAIL. Insight into the respective contribution of the agonistic receptors TRAIL-R1 and TRAIL-R2 to TRAIL-induced apoptosis may provide a rational approach to further optimize TRAIL-based therapy. Recently, this issue has been investigated using sTRAIL mutants designed to selectively bind to either receptor. However, the relative contribution of the respective TRAIL receptors, in particular TRAIL-R1, in TRAIL signaling is still unresolved. Here, we fused scFv425 to designed sTRAIL mutant sTRAILmR1-5, reported to selectively activate TRAIL-R1, and investigated the therapeutic apoptotic activity of this novel fusion protein. EGFR-specific binding of scFv425:sTRAILmR1-5 potently induced apoptosis, which was superior to the apoptotic activity of scFv425:sTRAIL-wt and a nontargeted MOCK-scFv:sTRAILmR1-5. During cotreatment with cisplatin or the histone deacetylase inhibitor valproic acid, scFv425:sTRAILmR1-5 retained its superior pro-apoptotic activity compared to scFv425:sTRAIL-wt. However, in catching-type Enzyme-Linked ImmunoSorbent Assays with TRAIL-R1:Fc and TRAIL-R2:Fc, scFv425:sTRAILmR1-5 was found to not only bind to TRAIL-R1 but also to TRAIL-R2. Binding to TRAIL-R2 also had functional consequences because the apoptotic activity of scFv425:sTRAILmR1-5 was strongly inhibited by a TRAIL-R2 blocking monoclonal antibody. Moreover, scFv425:sTRAILmR1-5 retained apoptotic activity upon selective knockdown of TRAIL-R1 using small inhibitory RNA. Collectively, these data indicate that both agonistic TRAIL receptors are functionally involved in TRAIL signaling by scFv425:sTRAILmR1-5 in solid tumor cells. Moreover, the superior target cell-restricted apoptotic activity of scFv425:sTRAILmR1-5 indicates its therapeutic potential for EGFR-positive solid tumors.
此前,我们已经表明,通过与抗体片段scFv425进行基因融合,可实现可溶性肿瘤坏死因子相关凋亡诱导配体(sTRAIL)对表皮生长因子受体(EGFR)的选择性递送,从而增强sTRAIL的肿瘤选择性促凋亡活性。深入了解激动性受体TRAIL-R1和TRAIL-R2对TRAIL诱导凋亡的各自贡献,可能为进一步优化基于TRAIL的治疗提供合理方法。最近,已使用设计用于选择性结合任一受体的sTRAIL突变体对此问题进行了研究。然而,在TRAIL信号传导中,各个TRAIL受体,特别是TRAIL-R1的相对贡献仍未解决。在此,我们将scFv425与设计的sTRAIL突变体sTRAILmR1-5融合,据报道该突变体可选择性激活TRAIL-R1,并研究了这种新型融合蛋白的治疗性凋亡活性。scFv425:sTRAILmR1-5的EGFR特异性结合有效诱导了凋亡,其凋亡活性优于scFv425:sTRAIL-wt和非靶向的MOCK-scFv:sTRAILmR1-5。在与顺铂或组蛋白去乙酰化酶抑制剂丙戊酸联合治疗期间,与scFv425:sTRAIL-wt相比,scFv425:sTRAILmR1-5保留了其优越的促凋亡活性。然而,在使用TRAIL-R1:Fc和TRAIL-R2:Fc进行捕获型酶联免疫吸附测定中,发现scFv425:sTRAILmR1-5不仅与TRAIL-R1结合,还与TRAIL-R2结合。与TRAIL-R2的结合也产生了功能后果,因为scFv425:sTRAILmR1-5的凋亡活性被TRAIL-R2阻断单克隆抗体强烈抑制。此外,在使用小干扰RNA选择性敲低TRAIL-R1后,scFv425:sTRAILmR1-5仍保留凋亡活性。总体而言,这些数据表明,在实体瘤细胞中,两种激动性TRAIL受体在scFv425:sTRAILmR1-5的TRAIL信号传导中均发挥功能作用。此外,scFv425:sTRAILmR1-5优越的靶细胞限制性凋亡活性表明其对EGFR阳性实体瘤具有治疗潜力。