• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

西班牙精神科住院护理单位成本计算的方法学进展

Methodological advances in unit cost calculation of psychiatric residential care in Spain.

作者信息

Moreno Karen, Sanchez Eduardo, Salvador-Carulla Luis

机构信息

Department of Business Administration, Public University of Navarre, Navarre, Spain.

出版信息

J Ment Health Policy Econ. 2008 Jun;11(2):79-88.

PMID:18509215
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The care of the severe mentally ill who need intensive support for their daily living (dependent persons), accounts for an increasingly large proportion of public expenditure in many European countries.

AIMS OF THE STUDY

The main aim of this study was the design and implementation of solid methodology to calculate unit costs of different types of care. To date, methodologies used in Spain have produced inaccurate figures, suggesting few variations in patient consumption of the same service.

METHODS

An adaptation of the Activity-Based-Costing methodology was applied in Navarre, a region in the North of Spain, as a pilot project for the public mental health services. A unit cost per care process was obtained for all levels of care considered in each service during 2005. The European Service Mapping Schedule (ESMS) codes were used to classify the services for later comparisons. Finally, in order to avoid problems of asymmetric cost distribution, a simple Bayesian model was used.

RESULTS

As an illustration, we report the results obtained for long-term residential care and note that there are important variations between unit costs when considering different levels of care. Considering three levels of care (Level 1-low, Level 2-medium and Level 3-intensive), the cost per bed in Level 3 was 10% higher than that of Level 2.

DISCUSSION

The results obtained using the cost methodology described provide more useful information than those using conventional methods, although its implementation requires much time to compile the necessary information during the initial stages and the collaboration of staff and managers working in the services. However, in some services, if no important variations exist in patient care, another method would be advisable, although our system provides very useful information about patterns of care from a clinical point of view.

CONCLUSIONS

Detailed work is required at the beginning of the implementation in order to avoid the calculation of distorted figures and to improve the levels of decision making within the Health Care Service. IMPLICATIONS FOR HEALTH CARE POLICY AND FORMULATIONS: As other European countries, Spain has adopted a new care system for the dependent population. To finance this new system, reliable figures must be calculated for each type of user in order to establish tariffs or public prices. This study provides a useful management tool to assist in decision making.

IMPLICATIONS FOR FUTURE RESEARCH

The methodology should be implemented in other regions of Spain and even in other countries in order to compare our results and validate the cost system designed.

摘要

背景

在许多欧洲国家,为日常生活需要密集支持的重症精神病患者(依赖他人者)提供护理的公共支出占比越来越大。

研究目的

本研究的主要目的是设计并实施可靠的方法来计算不同类型护理的单位成本。迄今为止,西班牙使用的方法得出的数字不准确,表明同一服务的患者消费几乎没有差异。

方法

在西班牙北部的纳瓦拉地区应用了基于活动成本核算方法的一种改编方法,作为公共精神卫生服务的试点项目。2005年期间,针对每项服务所考虑的所有护理级别得出了每个护理流程的单位成本。使用欧洲服务映射时间表(ESMS)代码对服务进行分类以便后续比较。最后,为避免成本分配不对称问题,使用了一个简单的贝叶斯模型。

结果

作为示例,我们报告了长期住院护理所获得的结果,并指出在考虑不同护理级别时单位成本存在重要差异。考虑三个护理级别(1级 - 低、2级 - 中、3级 - 高),3级的每张床位成本比2级高10%。

讨论

使用所述成本核算方法获得的结果比使用传统方法提供了更有用的信息,尽管其实施在初始阶段需要花费大量时间来收集必要信息,并且需要服务部门的工作人员和管理人员协作。然而,在某些服务中,如果患者护理没有重要差异,另一种方法可能更可取,尽管我们的系统从临床角度提供了有关护理模式的非常有用的信息。

结论

在实施开始时需要进行详细工作,以避免计算出失真的数字并提高医疗服务中的决策水平。对医疗保健政策和制定的影响:与其他欧洲国家一样,西班牙为依赖人群采用了新的护理系统。为了资助这个新系统,必须为每种类型的用户计算可靠的数字,以便确定收费标准或公共价格。本研究提供了一个有用的管理工具来协助决策。

对未来研究的影响

应在西班牙的其他地区甚至其他国家实施该方法,以便比较我们的结果并验证所设计的成本系统。

相似文献

1
Methodological advances in unit cost calculation of psychiatric residential care in Spain.西班牙精神科住院护理单位成本计算的方法学进展
J Ment Health Policy Econ. 2008 Jun;11(2):79-88.
2
An analysis of the costs of treating schizophrenia in Spain: a hierarchical Bayesian approach.西班牙精神分裂症治疗成本分析:一种分层贝叶斯方法。
J Ment Health Policy Econ. 2005 Sep;8(3):153-65.
3
Estimating the costs of psychiatric hospital services at a public health facility in Nigeria.估算尼日利亚一家公共卫生机构的精神病院服务成本。
J Ment Health Policy Econ. 2012 Sep;15(3):139-48.
4
Should "standard gamble" and "'time trade off" utility measurement be used more in mental health research?“标准博弈”和“时间权衡”效用测量是否应在心理健康研究中得到更多应用?
J Ment Health Policy Econ. 2010 Jun;13(2):65-72.
5
Organizational and client determinants of cost in outpatient substance abuse treatment.门诊药物滥用治疗中成本的组织和客户决定因素。
J Ment Health Policy Econ. 2007 Mar;10(1):3-13.
6
What should the government do regarding health policy-making to develop community health care in Shanghai?政府应该在制定健康政策方面采取哪些措施来发展上海的社区卫生保健?
Int J Health Plann Manage. 2011 Oct-Dec;26(4):379-435. doi: 10.1002/hpm.1117.
7
Variation in patient routine costliness in U.S. psychiatric facilities.美国精神病治疗机构中患者常规费用的差异。
J Ment Health Policy Econ. 2005 Mar;8(1):15-28.
8
Managed care, networks and trends in hospital care for mental health and substance abuse treatment in Massachusetts: 1994-1999.马萨诸塞州精神健康与药物滥用治疗的医院护理中的管理式医疗、网络及趋势:1994 - 1999年
J Ment Health Policy Econ. 2003 Mar;6(1):3-12.
9
Service organisation, service use and costs of community mental health care.社区精神卫生保健的服务机构、服务利用及成本
J Ment Health Policy Econ. 2002 Jun;5(2):79-87.
10
Community/hospital indicators in South African public sector mental health services.南非公共部门心理健康服务中的社区/医院指标
J Ment Health Policy Econ. 2003 Dec;6(4):181-7.

引用本文的文献

1
Magnitude of terminological bias in international health services research: a disambiguation analysis in mental health.国际卫生服务研究中术语偏见的程度:心理健康中的消歧分析。
Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci. 2022 Aug 22;31:e59. doi: 10.1017/S2045796022000403.
2
Harmonization issues in unit costing of service use for multi-country, multi-sectoral health economic evaluations: a scoping review.多国家、多部门卫生经济评估中服务使用单位成本核算的协调问题:一项范围综述
Health Econ Rev. 2022 Aug 3;12(1):42. doi: 10.1186/s13561-022-00390-y.
3
Fit for Purpose-Re-Designing Australia's Mental Health Information System.
适合目的——重新设计澳大利亚的心理健康信息系统。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Apr 15;19(8):4808. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19084808.