当项目对一些人的益处多于其他人时：差异化服务效果测试
When programs benefit some people more than others: tests of differential service effectiveness.
作者信息
Macias Cathaleene, Jones Danson R, Hargreaves William A, Wang Qi, Rodican Charles F, Barreira Paul J, Gold Paul B
机构信息
McLean Hospital, Belmont, MA, USA.
出版信息
Adm Policy Ment Health. 2008 Jul;35(4):283-94. doi: 10.1007/s10488-008-0174-y.
Abstract
Practitioners need to know for whom evidence-based services are most or least effective, but few services research studies provide this information. Using data from a randomized controlled comparison of supported employment findings for two multi-service psychiatric rehabilitation programs, we illustrate and compare procedures for measuring program-by-client characteristic interactions depicting differential program effectiveness, and then illustrate how a significant program-by-client interaction can explain overall program differences in service effectiveness. Interaction analyses based on cluster analysis-identified sample subgroups appear to provide statistically powerful and meaningful hypothesis tests that can aid in the interpretation of main effect findings and help to refine program theory.
摘要
从业者需要了解循证服务对哪些人最有效或最无效，但很少有服务研究能提供此类信息。利用两项多服务精神康复项目的支持性就业结果的随机对照比较数据，我们阐述并比较了衡量项目与客户特征交互作用（描述不同项目效果）的程序，然后说明了显著的项目与客户交互作用如何能够解释服务效果方面的总体项目差异。基于聚类分析确定的样本亚组进行的交互分析似乎能提供具有统计学效力且有意义的假设检验，有助于解释主效应结果并帮助完善项目理论。
相似文献
1
When programs benefit some people more than others: tests of differential service effectiveness.当项目对一些人的益处多于其他人时：差异化服务效果测试
Adm Policy Ment Health. 2008 Jul;35(4):283-94. doi: 10.1007/s10488-008-0174-y.
2
Systematic reviews of the effectiveness of day care for people with severe mental disorders: (1) acute day hospital versus admission; (2) vocational rehabilitation; (3) day hospital versus outpatient care.针对重度精神障碍患者日间护理效果的系统评价：（1）急性日间医院与住院治疗对比；（2）职业康复；（3）日间医院与门诊护理对比。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(21):1-75. doi: 10.3310/hta5210.
3
Interventions for obtaining and maintaining employment in adults with severe mental illness, a network meta-analysis.针对重度精神疾病成年人获得和维持就业的干预措施：一项网状荟萃分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Sep 12;9(9):CD011867. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011867.pub2.
4
Implementing supported employment as an evidence-based practice.将支持性就业作为一种循证实践加以实施。
Psychiatr Serv. 2001 Mar;52(3):313-22. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.52.3.313.
5
Client, Contextual and Program Elements Influencing Supported Employment: A Literature Review.影响支持性就业的客户、情境和项目因素：文献综述
Community Ment Health J. 2016 Oct;52(7):809-20. doi: 10.1007/s10597-015-9936-7. Epub 2016 Apr 7.
6
A randomized controlled trial of a supported employment program for persons with long-term mental illness in Hong Kong.香港一项针对长期患有精神疾病者的支持性就业计划的随机对照试验。
Psychiatr Serv. 2008 Jan;59(1):84-90. doi: 10.1176/ps.2008.59.1.84.
7
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区，服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中，叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
8
Consumer-providers of care for adult clients of statutory mental health services.法定心理健康服务成年客户的护理消费者提供者。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Mar 28;2013(3):CD004807. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004807.pub2.
9
Integration of psychiatric and vocational services: a multisite randomized, controlled trial of supported employment.精神科与职业服务的整合：一项支持性就业的多地点随机对照试验。
Am J Psychiatry. 2005 Oct;162(10):1948-56. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.162.10.1948.
10
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
引用本文的文献
1
2
Are Single-Item Global Ratings Useful for Assessing Health Status?单项整体评分对评估健康状况有用吗？
J Clin Psychol Med Settings. 2015 Oct 22. doi: 10.1007/s10880-015-9436-5.
3
Work reintegration for veterans with mental disorders: a systematic literature review to inform research.精神障碍退伍军人的工作重返：一项系统文献综述，旨在为研究提供信息。
Phys Ther. 2013 Sep;93(9):1163-74. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20120156. Epub 2012 Oct 4.
4
Profiles of disability among adults with bipolar spectrum disorders.双相谱系障碍成人的残疾特征。
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2010 Dec;45(12):1125-34. doi: 10.1007/s00127-009-0153-y. Epub 2009 Oct 23.
5
Who benefits from supported employment: a meta-analytic study.支持性就业的受益者：一项荟萃分析研究。
Schizophr Bull. 2011 Mar;37(2):370-80. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbp066. Epub 2009 Aug 6.
本文引用的文献
1
Selective publication of antidepressant trials and its influence on apparent efficacy.抗抑郁药物试验的选择性发表及其对表面疗效的影响。
N Engl J Med. 2008 Jan 17;358(3):252-60. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa065779.
2
Modified therapeutic community treatment for offenders with MICA disorders: substance use outcomes.针对患有精神疾病与物质使用障碍（MICA）的罪犯的改良治疗社区疗法：物质使用结果
Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse. 2007;33(6):823-32. doi: 10.1080/00952990701653800.
3
Which heavy drinking college students benefit from a brief motivational intervention?哪些酗酒的大学生能从简短的动机干预中受益？
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2007 Aug;75(4):663-9. doi: 10.1037/0022-006X.75.4.663.
4
Attachment as moderator of treatment outcome in major depression: a randomized control trial of interpersonal psychotherapy versus cognitive behavior therapy.依恋作为重度抑郁症治疗结果的调节因素：人际心理治疗与认知行为治疗的随机对照试验
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2006 Dec;74(6):1041-54. doi: 10.1037/0022-006X.74.6.1041.
5
Supported employment outcomes of a randomized controlled trial of ACT and clubhouse models.强化个案管理（ACT）与俱乐部模式随机对照试验的就业支持成果
Psychiatr Serv. 2006 Oct;57(10):1406-15. doi: 10.1176/ps.2006.57.10.1406.
6
Interrelationships of psychiatric symptom severity, medical comorbidity, and functioning in schizophrenia.精神分裂症中精神症状严重程度、躯体共病和功能之间的相互关系。
Psychiatr Serv. 2006 Aug;57(8):1102-9. doi: 10.1176/ps.2006.57.8.1102.
7
A comparison of outcomes among patients with schizophrenia in two mental health systems: a health state approach.两个精神卫生系统中精神分裂症患者结局的比较：一种健康状态方法。
Schizophr Res. 2006 Sep;86(1-3):309-20. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2006.04.026. Epub 2006 Jun 27.
8
Lifetime prevalence and pseudocomorbidity in psychiatric research.精神病学研究中的终生患病率和假性共病
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2006 Jun;63(6):604-8. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.63.6.604.
9
Allocating treatment options to patient profiles: clinical art or science?为患者档案分配治疗方案：临床艺术还是科学？
Addiction. 2006 May;101(5):646-52. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2006.01366.x.
10
Demographic characteristics and employment among people with severe mental illness in a multisite study.一项多中心研究中重度精神疾病患者的人口统计学特征与就业情况
Community Ment Health J. 2006 Apr;42(2):143-59. doi: 10.1007/s10597-005-9017-4.
Zotero 插件