Jen Min Hua, Jones Kelvyn, Johnston Ron
Department of Primary Care and Social Medicine, Imperial College London, London W6 8RP, UK.
Health Place. 2009 Mar;15(1):198-203. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2008.04.005. Epub 2008 Apr 30.
Much research into health behaviour and outcomes involves evaluating compositional and contextual hypotheses: the former suggest that behaviour/outcomes are a function of the individual's characteristics alone, whereas the latter argue for the importance of contextual/environmental influences. Wilkinson has presented a contextual argument relating inter-country variations in mortality rates to income inequalities; Gravelle has countered this arguing that Wilkinson's findings are a statistical artefact and that a compositional approach, relating mortality to individual income, is sufficient. Discriminating between these two cases requires a methodology combining the two approaches. Multi-level modelling is proposed and applied to two data sets. The results sustain Gravelle's case, emphasising the role of compositional rather than contextual variables in accounting for inter-country variations in health status.
前者认为行为/结果仅是个体特征的函数,而后者则强调情境/环境影响的重要性。威尔金森提出了一种情境性观点,将国家间死亡率的差异与收入不平等联系起来;格拉韦尔对此进行了反驳,认为威尔金森的发现是一种统计假象,并且将死亡率与个人收入联系起来的构成性方法就足够了。区分这两种情况需要一种将两种方法结合起来的方法论。本文提出了多层次建模并将其应用于两个数据集。结果支持了格拉韦尔的观点,强调了构成性变量而非情境性变量在解释国家间健康状况差异方面的作用。