• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

婴儿期感染与意外猝死:一项系统性回顾性病例分析

Infection and sudden unexpected death in infancy: a systematic retrospective case review.

作者信息

Weber M A, Klein N J, Hartley J C, Lock P E, Malone M, Sebire N J

机构信息

Department of Paediatric Pathology, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children and the Institute of Child Health, University College London, London, UK.

出版信息

Lancet. 2008 May 31;371(9627):1848-53. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60798-9.

DOI:10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60798-9
PMID:18514728
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The cause and mechanism of most cases of sudden unexpected death in infancy (SUDI) remain unknown, despite specialist autopsy examination. We reviewed autopsy results to determine whether infection was a cause of SUDI.

METHODS

We did a systematic retrospective case review of autopsies, done at one specialist centre between 1996 and 2005, of 546 infants (aged 7-365 days) who died suddenly and unexpectedly. Cases of SUDI were categorised as unexplained, explained with histological evidence of bacterial infection, or explained by non-infective causes. Microbial isolates gathered at autopsy were classified as non-pathogens, group 1 pathogens (organisms usually associated with an identifiable focus of infection), or group 2 pathogens (organisms known to cause septicaemia without an obvious focus of infection).

FINDINGS

Of 546 SUDI cases, 39 autopsies were excluded because of viral or pneumocystis infection or secondary bacterial infection after initial collapse and resuscitation. Bacteriological sampling was done in 470 (93%) of the remaining 507 autopsies. 2079 bacteriological samples were taken, of which 571 (27%) were sterile. Positive cultures yielded 2871 separate isolates, 484 (32%) of which showed pure growth and 1024 (68%) mixed growth. Significantly more isolates from infants whose deaths were explained by bacterial infection (78/322, 24%) and from those whose death was unexplained (440/2306, 19%) contained group 2 pathogens than did those from infants whose death was explained by a non-infective cause (27/243, 11%; difference 13.1%, 95% CI 6.9-19.2, p<0.0001 vs bacterial infection; and 8.0%, 3.2-11.8, p=0.001 vs unexplained). Significantly more cultures from infants whose deaths were unexplained contained Staphylococcus aureus (262/1628, 16%) or Escherichia coli (93/1628; 6%) than did those from infants whose deaths were of non-infective cause (S aureus: 19/211, 9%; difference 7.1%, 95% CI 2.2-10.8, p=0.005; E coli: 3/211, 1%, difference 4.3%, 1.5-5.9, p=0.003).

INTERPRETATION

Although many post-mortem bacteriological cultures in SUDI yield organisms, most seem to be unrelated to the cause of death. The high rate of detection of group 2 pathogens, particularly S aureus and E coli, in otherwise unexplained cases of SUDI suggests that these bacteria could be associated with this condition.

摘要

背景

尽管进行了专业尸检,但大多数婴儿猝死综合征(SUDI)病例的病因和机制仍不清楚。我们回顾了尸检结果,以确定感染是否为SUDI的病因。

方法

我们对1996年至2005年间在一个专业中心对546名(年龄7至365天)突然意外死亡的婴儿进行的尸检进行了系统的回顾性病例分析。SUDI病例分为无法解释的、有细菌感染组织学证据可解释的或由非感染性原因解释的。尸检时采集的微生物分离株分为非病原体、1组病原体(通常与可识别的感染灶相关的微生物)或2组病原体(已知可导致败血症且无明显感染灶的微生物)。

结果

在546例SUDI病例中,39例尸检因病毒或肺孢子菌感染或初始心脏骤停及复苏后的继发性细菌感染而被排除。在其余507例尸检中的470例(93%)进行了细菌学采样。共采集了2079份细菌学样本,其中571份(27%)无菌。阳性培养物产生了2871个单独的分离株,其中484个(32%)显示为纯培养生长,1024个(68%)为混合生长。与死亡由非感染性原因解释的婴儿相比,死亡由细菌感染解释的婴儿(78/322,24%)和死亡原因不明的婴儿(440/2306,19%)中含有2组病原体的分离株明显更多(与细菌感染相比,差异为13.1%,95%CI 6.9 - 19.2,p<0.0001;与原因不明相比,差异为8.0%,3.2 - 11.8,p = 0.001)。死亡原因不明的婴儿的培养物中金黄色葡萄球菌(262/1628,16%)或大肠杆菌(93/1628;6%)的检出率明显高于死亡由非感染性原因导致的婴儿(金黄色葡萄球菌:19/211,9%;差异为7.1%,95%CI 2.2 - 10.8,p = 0.005;大肠杆菌:3/211,1%,差异为4.3%,1.5 - 5.9,p = 0.003)。

解读

尽管SUDI的许多尸检细菌学培养产生了微生物,但大多数似乎与死亡原因无关。在其他原因不明的SUDI病例中2组病原体,特别是金黄色葡萄球菌和大肠杆菌的高检出率表明这些细菌可能与这种情况有关。

相似文献

1
Infection and sudden unexpected death in infancy: a systematic retrospective case review.婴儿期感染与意外猝死:一项系统性回顾性病例分析
Lancet. 2008 May 31;371(9627):1848-53. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60798-9.
2
Staphylococcal toxins in sudden unexpected death in infancy: experience from a single specialist centre.婴儿猝死综合征中的葡萄球菌毒素:来自单一专科中心的经验
Forensic Sci Med Pathol. 2011 Jun;7(2):141-7. doi: 10.1007/s12024-010-9199-0. Epub 2010 Nov 10.
3
Sudden unexpected death in infancy (SUDI): a new anatomo-clinical approach.
Europace. 2009 Mar;11(3):395. doi: 10.1093/europace/eup012. Epub 2009 Feb 6.
4
Autopsy findings of co-sleeping-associated sudden unexpected deaths in infancy: relationship between pathological features and asphyxial mode of death.婴儿同床睡眠相关意外猝死的尸检结果:病理特征与窒息死亡方式之间的关系
J Paediatr Child Health. 2012 Apr;48(4):335-41. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1754.2011.02228.x. Epub 2011 Oct 21.
5
Microbiological findings in sudden unexpected death in infancy: comparison of immediate postmortem sampling in casualty departments and at autopsy.婴儿猝死症的微生物学研究:急症室与尸检时即时死后取样的比较。
J Clin Pathol. 2011 May;64(5):421-5. doi: 10.1136/jcp.2011.089698. Epub 2011 Mar 8.
6
Sterile site infection at autopsy in sudden unexpected deaths in infancy.婴儿猝死尸检时的无菌部位感染
Arch Dis Child. 2009 Apr;94(4):303-7. doi: 10.1136/adc.2007.135939. Epub 2008 Sep 15.
7
Post-mortem interval and bacteriological culture yield in sudden unexpected death in infancy (SUDI).婴儿猝死综合征(SUDI)中的死后间隔时间和细菌培养产量。
Forensic Sci Int. 2010 May 20;198(1-3):121-5. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2010.02.002. Epub 2010 Mar 11.
8
The role of post-mortem investigations in determining the cause of sudden unexpected death in infancy.尸检调查在确定婴儿猝死原因中的作用。
Arch Dis Child. 2008 Dec;93(12):1048-53. doi: 10.1136/adc.2007.136739. Epub 2008 Jun 30.
9
Virological investigations in sudden unexpected deaths in infancy (SUDI).婴儿猝死综合征(SUDI)的病毒学调查。
Forensic Sci Med Pathol. 2010 Dec;6(4):261-7. doi: 10.1007/s12024-010-9181-x. Epub 2010 Jul 11.
10
Natural Diseases Causing Sudden Death in Infancy and Early Childhood导致婴幼儿期猝死的自然疾病

引用本文的文献

1
Rates of Sudden Unexpected Infant Death Before and During the COVID-19 Pandemic.COVID-19 大流行前后婴儿突然意外死亡的发生率。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Sep 3;7(9):e2435722. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.35722.
2
Postnatal steroids as lung protective and anti-inflammatory in preterm lambs exposed to antenatal inflammation.产后使用类固醇对暴露于产前炎症的早产羔羊具有肺保护和抗炎作用。
Pediatr Res. 2024 Mar;95(4):931-940. doi: 10.1038/s41390-023-02911-9. Epub 2023 Dec 8.
3
Screening for viral pathogens in the gastrointestinal tract from cases of sudden unexpected death in infancy at the Tygerberg Medico-legal Mortuary.
从泰格伯格法医太平间婴儿猝死病例的胃肠道中筛选病毒病原体。
Virol J. 2023 Nov 29;20(1):281. doi: 10.1186/s12985-023-02249-y.
4
Sudden Infant Death Syndrome: Risk Factors and Newer Risk Reduction Strategies.婴儿猝死综合征:危险因素及新的降低风险策略
Cureus. 2023 Jun 17;15(6):e40572. doi: 10.7759/cureus.40572. eCollection 2023 Jun.
5
Pulmonary immune profiling of SIDS: impaired immune maturation and age-related cytokine imbalance.婴儿猝死综合征的肺部免疫特征:免疫成熟受损和与年龄相关的细胞因子失衡。
Pediatr Res. 2023 Apr;93(5):1239-1249. doi: 10.1038/s41390-022-02203-8. Epub 2022 Aug 19.
6
The Science (or Nonscience) of Research Into Sudden Infant Death Syndrome (SIDS).婴儿猝死综合征(SIDS)研究中的科学(或非科学)
Front Pediatr. 2022 Apr 15;10:865051. doi: 10.3389/fped.2022.865051. eCollection 2022.
7
Is There a Role for the Microbiome and Sudden Death? A Systematic Review.微生物群与猝死之间存在关联吗?一项系统综述。
Life (Basel). 2021 Dec 4;11(12):1345. doi: 10.3390/life11121345.
8
Chorioamnionitis, Inflammation and Neonatal Apnea: Effects on Preterm Neonatal Brainstem and on Peripheral Airways: Chorioamnionitis and Neonatal Respiratory Functions.绒毛膜羊膜炎、炎症与新生儿呼吸暂停:对早产新生儿脑干及外周气道的影响:绒毛膜羊膜炎与新生儿呼吸功能
Children (Basel). 2021 Oct 15;8(10):917. doi: 10.3390/children8100917.
9
Characterising Post-mortem Bacterial Translocation Under Clinical Conditions Using 16S rRNA Gene Sequencing in Two Animal Models.在两种动物模型中使用16S rRNA基因测序对临床条件下的死后细菌易位进行表征
Front Microbiol. 2021 May 31;12:649312. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.649312. eCollection 2021.
10
Microbiology in minimally invasive autopsy: best techniques to detect infection. ESGFOR (ESCMID study group of forensic and post-mortem microbiology) guidelines.微创尸检中的微生物学:检测感染的最佳技术。ESGFOR(欧洲临床微生物学和感染病学会法医和死后微生物学研究组)指南。
Forensic Sci Med Pathol. 2021 Mar;17(1):87-100. doi: 10.1007/s12024-020-00337-x. Epub 2021 Jan 19.