Suppr超能文献

1型糖尿病患者的血糖不稳定:糖尿病发病时酮症或酮症酸中毒的可能作用。

Glycemic instability in type 1 diabetic patients: Possible role of ketosis or ketoacidosis at onset of diabetes.

作者信息

Sassa Mariko, Yamada Yuichiro, Hosokawa Masaya, Fukuda Kazuhito, Fujimoto Shimpei, Toyoda Kentaro, Tsukiyama Katsushi, Seino Yutaka, Inagaki Nobuya

机构信息

Department of Diabetes and Clinical Nutrition, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, 54 Kawahara-cho, Shogoin, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto 606-8507, Japan.

出版信息

Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2008 Aug;81(2):190-5. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2008.04.009. Epub 2008 Jun 2.

Abstract

AIMS

In type 1 diabetic patients, some have glycemic instability while others glycemic stability. We have developed criteria for evaluating glycemic instability and investigated the factors responsible.

METHODS

Glycemic instability in 52 type 1 diabetic patients was assessed by the mean amplitude of glycemic excursions (MAGE) and M-value, and clinical characteristics of good, fair and poor control groups were compared.

RESULTS

The median MAGE and M-value was 6.6mmol/L and 18.7, respectively. Then MAGE >or=6.6mmol/L and M-value >or=18.7 was defined as poor control. In the 32 patients without detectable C-peptide levels, 18 patients (56%) showed poor control. The frequency of ketosis or ketoacidosis at onset of diabetes was dramatically higher in the poor control group not only in the patients as a whole but also in those without detectable C-peptide levels.

CONCLUSIONS

A decreased level of C-peptide is a significant factor in glycemic instability. However, some patients have glycemic stability though beta-cell function is completely depleted. The presence of ketosis or ketoacidosis at onset of diabetes may be a factor in later glycemic instability, suggesting the importance of examining patients in detail at onset of diabetes for careful follow-up to prevent progression of acute and chronic complications of diabetes.

摘要

目的

在1型糖尿病患者中,一些患者血糖不稳定,而另一些患者血糖稳定。我们制定了评估血糖不稳定的标准,并对相关因素进行了研究。

方法

通过血糖波动幅度均值(MAGE)和M值评估52例1型糖尿病患者的血糖不稳定情况,并比较血糖控制良好、一般和较差组的临床特征。

结果

MAGE和M值的中位数分别为6.6mmol/L和18.7。然后将MAGE≥6.6mmol/L且M值≥18.7定义为控制不佳。在32例C肽水平检测不到的患者中,18例(56%)控制不佳。糖尿病发病时酮症或酮症酸中毒的发生率在控制不佳组显著更高,不仅在总体患者中如此,在C肽水平检测不到的患者中也是如此。

结论

C肽水平降低是血糖不稳定的一个重要因素。然而,一些患者尽管β细胞功能完全丧失,但血糖仍保持稳定。糖尿病发病时存在酮症或酮症酸中毒可能是后期血糖不稳定的一个因素,这表明在糖尿病发病时对患者进行详细检查对于仔细随访以预防糖尿病急慢性并发症进展的重要性。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验