Crawford Thomas N, Cohen Patricia, First Michael B, Skodol Andrew E, Johnson Jeffrey G, Kasen Stephanie
Children in the Community Study, 100 Haven Ave, Ste 31F, New York, NY 10032, USA.
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2008 Jun;65(6):641-8. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.65.6.641.
Although Axis II personality disorders in adolescence have been linked to psychopathology and psychosocial impairment in early adulthood, little is known about their effects over longer periods.
To evaluate and compare long-term prognoses of adolescent personality disorders and co-occurring Axis I disorders.
Population-based longitudinal study.
Upstate New York.
A community sample of 629 adolescents interviewed at a mean age of 13.8 years and again at a mean age of 33.2 years.
Clinically assessed psychiatric disorders and self-reported attainment and function.
Axis I (mood, anxiety, disruptive behavior, and substance use disorders) and Axis II disorders in adolescence showed risks for negative prognoses lasting 20 years. Co-occurring Axis I and Axis II disorders consistently presented the highest risk, often approximating the sum of the axis-associated risk or even several times the risk of disorders in either axis alone.
Long-term prognoses of Axis I and Axis II disorders are of comparable magnitude and often additive when comorbid. These findings are highly relevant to the current debate over how personality disorders should be handled in DSM-V.
尽管青少年期的轴II人格障碍与成年早期的精神病理学及社会心理损害有关,但对于其在更长时期内的影响却知之甚少。
评估并比较青少年人格障碍及共病的轴I障碍的长期预后。
基于人群的纵向研究。
纽约州北部。
一个社区样本,629名青少年,平均年龄13.8岁时接受访谈,平均年龄33.2岁时再次接受访谈。
临床评估的精神障碍以及自我报告的成就和功能。
青少年期的轴I(情绪、焦虑、破坏行为和物质使用障碍)及轴II障碍显示出持续20年的负面预后风险。轴I和轴II共病障碍始终呈现出最高风险,通常接近与各轴相关风险之和,甚至是任一轴单独出现障碍风险的数倍。
轴I和轴II障碍的长期预后程度相当,共病时往往具有累加性。这些发现与当前关于《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第五版(DSM-V)中应如何处理人格障碍的争论高度相关。