Campobasso Carlo P, Dell'Erba Alessandro S, Addante Annalisa, Zotti Fiorenza, Marzullo Andrea, Colonna Massimo F
Department of Health Sciences, University of Molise, Campobasso, Italy.
Am J Forensic Med Pathol. 2008 Jun;29(2):154-61. doi: 10.1097/PAF.0b013e318177eab7.
The postmortem diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction represents a current challenge for forensic pathologists, particularly when death occurs within minutes to a few hours after the ischemic insult. Among the adult population the single most important cause of sudden cardiac death (SCD) is the well-known atherosclerotic coronary artery disease, commonly asymptomatic or unrecognized. The recognition of early myocardial damage using routine hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining is possible only if death has occurred at least 6 hours after the onset of the ischemic injury. The usefulness of immunohistochemical markers to the diagnosis of early myocardial damage has been recently suggested because most of them can be visible even serologically as early as few minutes after the beginning of the symptoms. To evaluate the usefulness of plasma and cellular antigens, their distribution patterns have been studied among a group of 18 SCD cases in which a myocardial ischemia was strongly suspected. For the present study, 4 markers have been selected on the basis of their different diagnostic potential as follows: among the plasma markers the C5b-9 and fibronectin, among the cellular markers the myoglobin and cardiac troponin. The results show that only the study of multiple markers such as those selected can provide enough evidence of myocardial ischemia and/or necrosis, supporting the final diagnosis of SCD. No single immunohistochemical staining is ideal for diagnosing early myocardial ischemia but a set of markers can improve the ability of forensic pathologists to detect ischemic areas when no macroscopic or microscopic evidence of necrosis is available. However, the interpretation of data obtained in each individual cannot be isolated from the overall assessment of the factors (cardiopulmonary resuscitation and/or agonal artifacts) that can affect the expression of each marker.
急性心肌梗死的尸检诊断是法医病理学家目前面临的一项挑战,尤其是在缺血性损伤后几分钟到几小时内死亡的情况。在成年人群中,心脏性猝死(SCD)的最重要单一原因是众所周知的动脉粥样硬化性冠状动脉疾病,通常无症状或未被识别。只有在缺血性损伤发作后至少6小时死亡,才有可能通过常规苏木精和伊红(H&E)染色识别早期心肌损伤。最近有人提出免疫组化标志物对早期心肌损伤诊断的有用性,因为其中大多数甚至在症状开始后几分钟血清学上就可见。为了评估血浆和细胞抗原的有用性,在一组18例高度怀疑心肌缺血的SCD病例中研究了它们的分布模式。在本研究中,根据其不同的诊断潜力选择了4种标志物,如下:在血浆标志物中选择C5b-9和纤连蛋白,在细胞标志物中选择肌红蛋白和心肌肌钙蛋白。结果表明,只有对所选的多种标志物进行研究,才能提供足够的心肌缺血和/或坏死证据,支持SCD的最终诊断。没有单一的免疫组化染色对于诊断早期心肌缺血是理想的,但一组标志物可以提高法医病理学家在没有坏死的宏观或微观证据时检测缺血区域的能力。然而,每个个体获得的数据解释不能与可能影响每个标志物表达的因素(心肺复苏和/或濒死假象)的整体评估相分离。