• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

额外的患者体验项目能否提高CAHPS医院调查的可靠性并增加新的领域?

Can additional patient experience items improve the reliability of and add new domains to the CAHPS hospital survey?

作者信息

Rothman Arlyss Anderson, Park Hayoung, Hays Ron D, Edwards Carol, Dudley R Adams

机构信息

Phillip R. Lee Institute for Health Policy Studies, 401 Miner Road, Orinda, CA 94563, USA.

出版信息

Health Serv Res. 2008 Dec;43(6):2201-22. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2008.00867.x. Epub 2008 Jun 3.

DOI:10.1111/j.1475-6773.2008.00867.x
PMID:18522668
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2613993/
Abstract

CONTEXT

The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services will introduce the reporting of patient surveys in 2008. The Consumer Assessment of Health Care Providers and Systems (CAHPS) Hospital Survey contains 18 questions about hospital care. Internal consistency reliability of the discharge information scale is relatively low and some important domains of care are not represented.

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether adding questions increases the reliability and validity of the survey.

DATA SOURCES AND STUDY SETTING

Surveys of patients at 181 hospitals participating in the California Hospitals Assessment and Reporting Taskforce (CHART), an initiative for voluntary public reporting of hospital performance in California.

STUDY DESIGN

CHART added nine questions to the CAHPS Hospital Survey; two to improve reliability of the discharge information domain, five to create a coordination of care domain, and two relating to interpreter services.

DATA COLLECTION

Surveys were sent to randomly selected patients from each CHART hospital.

PRINCIPAL FINDINGS

A total of 40,172 surveys were included. Adding the new discharge information questions improved the internal consistency reliability from 0.45 to 0.72 and the hospital-level reliability from 0.75 to 0.81. New coordination of care composites had good internal consistency reliabilities ranging from 0.58 to 0.70 and hospital-level reliabilities ranging from 0.84 to 0.87. The new coordination of care composites were more closely correlated with overall hospital ratings and willingness to recommend than six of the seven original domains.

CONCLUSIONS

The additional discharge information questions and the new coordination of care questions significantly improved the psychometric properties of the CAHPS Hospital Survey.

摘要

背景

医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心将于2008年引入患者调查的报告。医疗服务提供者和系统消费者评估(CAHPS)医院调查包含18个关于医院护理的问题。出院信息量表的内部一致性信度相对较低,且一些重要的护理领域未被涵盖。

目的

确定增加问题是否能提高调查的信度和效度。

数据来源与研究背景

对参与加利福尼亚医院评估与报告特别工作组(CHART)的181家医院的患者进行调查,CHART是一项在加利福尼亚自愿公开报告医院绩效的倡议。

研究设计

CHART在CAHPS医院调查中增加了9个问题;2个用于提高出院信息领域的信度,5个用于创建护理协调领域,2个与口译服务相关。

数据收集

向每家CHART医院随机抽取的患者发送调查问卷。

主要发现

共纳入40172份调查问卷。增加新的出院信息问题后,内部一致性信度从0.45提高到0.72,医院层面的信度从0.75提高到0.81。新的护理协调综合指标具有良好的内部一致性信度,范围从0.58到0.70,医院层面的信度范围从0.84到0.87。新的护理协调综合指标与总体医院评级和推荐意愿的相关性比七个原始领域中的六个更紧密。

结论

额外的出院信息问题和新的护理协调问题显著改善了CAHPS医院调查的心理测量特性。

相似文献

1
Can additional patient experience items improve the reliability of and add new domains to the CAHPS hospital survey?额外的患者体验项目能否提高CAHPS医院调查的可靠性并增加新的领域?
Health Serv Res. 2008 Dec;43(6):2201-22. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2008.00867.x. Epub 2008 Jun 3.
2
Assessment of the equivalence of the Spanish and English versions of the CAHPS Hospital Survey on the quality of inpatient care.关于住院患者护理质量的CAHPS医院调查西班牙语版和英语版等效性评估。
Health Serv Res. 2005 Dec;40(6 Pt 2):2140-61. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2005.00469.x.
3
Psychometric properties of the Consumer Assessment of Health Plans Study (CAHPS) 2.0 adult core survey.消费者健康计划评估研究(CAHPS)2.0成人核心调查问卷的心理测量特性。
Health Serv Res. 2003 Dec;38(6 Pt 1):1509-27. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2003.00190.x.
4
Evaluation of the consumer assessment of healthcare providers and systems in-center hemodialysis survey.医疗机构和中心血液透析患者评估调查。
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2014 Jun 6;9(6):1099-108. doi: 10.2215/CJN.10121013. Epub 2014 May 15.
5
Psychometric properties of the Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS®) Clinician and Group Adult Visit Survey.消费者评估医疗保健提供者和系统(CAHPS®)临床医生和成人团体就诊调查的心理测量特性。
Med Care. 2012 Nov;50 Suppl(Suppl):S28-34. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e31826cbc0d.
6
Development and psychometric properties of the Japanese Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems Clinician & Group Survey (CG-CAHPS).日本医疗保健提供者和系统消费者评估临床医生和小组调查(CG-CAHPS)的开发和心理测量特性。
PLoS One. 2021 Apr 28;16(4):e0250843. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0250843. eCollection 2021.
7
Methods used to streamline the CAHPS Hospital Survey.用于简化CAHPS医院调查的方法。
Health Serv Res. 2005 Dec;40(6 Pt 2):2057-77. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2005.00478.x.
8
Development and evaluation of the CAHPS (Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems) survey for in-center hemodialysis patients.针对中心血液透析患者的CAHPS(医疗服务提供者与系统消费者评估)调查的开发与评估。
Am J Kidney Dis. 2014 Nov;64(5):753-60. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2014.04.021. Epub 2014 Jul 3.
9
Psychometric properties of the Dutch version of the Hospital-level Consumer Assessment of Health Plans Survey instrument.荷兰版医院层面健康计划消费者评估调查工具的心理测量特性。
Health Serv Res. 2006 Feb;41(1):284-301. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2005.00462.x.
10
Development of and field test results for the CAHPS PCMH Survey.CAHPS PCMH 调查的开发和现场测试结果。
Med Care. 2012 Nov;50 Suppl(Suppl):S2-10. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3182610aba.

引用本文的文献

1
Patient-Reported Experience Measures in Adult Inpatient Settings: A Systematic Review.成人住院患者自我报告的体验指标:一项系统综述
J Nurs Manag. 2024 Nov 23;2024:5166392. doi: 10.1155/jonm/5166392. eCollection 2024.
2
Patient Surveys Are Used Most Often to Assess Health Care Innovations, Rigorous Methods Are Less Common.患者调查最常用于评估医疗保健创新,而严格的方法则不太常见。
Am J Med Qual. 2024;39(4):188-196. doi: 10.1097/JMQ.0000000000000197. Epub 2024 Jul 8.
3
Building from Patient Experiences to Deliver Patient-Focused Healthcare Systems in Collaboration with Patients: A Call to Action.从患者体验出发,与患者合作构建以患者为中心的医疗保健系统:行动呼吁。
Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2022 Sep;56(5):848-858. doi: 10.1007/s43441-022-00432-x. Epub 2022 Jul 19.
4
Summary of the 2020 AHRQ research meeting on 'advancing methods of implementing and evaluating patient experience improvement using consumer assessment of healthcare providers and systems (CAHPS®) surveys'.2020 年 AHRQ 研究会议纪要:“利用医疗保健提供者和系统消费者评估调查(CAHPS®)推进实施和评估患者体验改善方法”。
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2022 Sep;22(6):883-890. doi: 10.1080/14737167.2022.2064848. Epub 2022 May 5.
5
Shadow Coaching Improves Patient Experience With Care, But Gains Erode Later.影子教练提高了患者的护理体验,但后来收益逐渐减少。
Med Care. 2021 Nov 1;59(11):950-960. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000001629.
6
Examining the Business Case for Patient Experience: A Systematic Review.审视患者体验的商业案例:系统评价。
J Healthc Manag. 2021;66(3):200-224. doi: 10.1097/JHM-D-20-00207.
7
Peplau's Theory of Interpersonal Relations: An Alternate Factor Structure for Patient Experience Data?佩普劳人际关系理论:患者体验数据的另一种因素结构?
Nurs Sci Q. 2017 Apr;30(2):160-167. doi: 10.1177/0894318417693286.
8
From the closest observers of patient care: a thematic analysis of online narrative reviews of hospitals.来自患者护理的最密切观察者:对医院在线叙事评论的主题分析。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2016 Nov;25(11):889-897. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2015-004515. Epub 2015 Dec 15.
9
Social support and responsiveness in online patient communities: impact on service quality perceptions.在线患者社区中的社会支持与响应性:对服务质量认知的影响。
Health Expect. 2016 Feb;19(1):87-97. doi: 10.1111/hex.12332. Epub 2015 Jan 2.
10
Evaluation of a Care Coordination Measure for the Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS) Medicare survey.针对医疗服务提供者及系统消费者评估(CAHPS)医疗保险调查的护理协调措施评估。
Med Care Res Rev. 2014 Apr;71(2):192-202. doi: 10.1177/1077558713508205. Epub 2013 Nov 13.

本文引用的文献

1
Psychometric properties of the Dutch version of the Hospital-level Consumer Assessment of Health Plans Survey instrument.荷兰版医院层面健康计划消费者评估调查工具的心理测量特性。
Health Serv Res. 2006 Feb;41(1):284-301. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2005.00462.x.
2
The CAHPS Hospital Survey: development, testing, and use.《医疗保健消费者评估医疗服务提供者和系统(CAHPS)医院调查:开发、测试与应用》
Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2005 Nov;31(11):655-9, 601. doi: 10.1016/s1553-7250(05)31084-1.
3
Methods used to streamline the CAHPS Hospital Survey.用于简化CAHPS医院调查的方法。
Health Serv Res. 2005 Dec;40(6 Pt 2):2057-77. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2005.00478.x.
4
Role of cognitive testing in the development of the CAHPS Hospital Survey.认知测试在CAHPS医院调查发展中的作用。
Health Serv Res. 2005 Dec;40(6 Pt 2):2037-56. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2005.00472.x.
5
What do consumers want to know about the quality of care in hospitals?消费者想了解关于医院护理质量的哪些方面?
Health Serv Res. 2005 Dec;40(6 Pt 2):2018-36. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2005.00473.x.
6
Development and evaluation of the CAHPS hospital survey.《消费者医疗保健提供者和系统评估(CAHPS)医院调查》的开发与评估
Health Serv Res. 2005 Dec;40(6 Pt 2):1973-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2005.00490.x.
7
Hospital performance reports: impact on quality, market share, and reputation.医院绩效报告:对质量、市场份额和声誉的影响。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2005 Jul-Aug;24(4):1150-60. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.24.4.1150.
8
Competition and health plan performance: evidence from health maintenance organization insurance markets.竞争与健康计划绩效:来自健康维护组织保险市场的证据
Med Care. 2005 Apr;43(4):338-46. doi: 10.1097/01.mlr.0000156863.61808.cb.
9
Assessing the quality of preparation for posthospital care from the patient's perspective: the care transitions measure.从患者角度评估出院后护理准备质量:护理过渡指标
Med Care. 2005 Mar;43(3):246-55. doi: 10.1097/00005650-200503000-00007.
10
Patients' experiences and satisfaction with health care: results of a questionnaire study of specific aspects of care.患者对医疗保健的体验与满意度:一项关于特定护理方面的问卷调查结果
Qual Saf Health Care. 2002 Dec;11(4):335-9. doi: 10.1136/qhc.11.4.335.