Champion H R, Sacco W J, Lepper R L, Atzinger E M, Copes W S, Prall R H
J Trauma. 1980 Mar;20(3):197-202. doi: 10.1097/00005373-198003000-00001.
Systems for the quantitation of injury severity are crucial to the study of injury epidemiology, and to comparative evaluations of health care delivery in different regions, patient mixes, and environment. Existing anatomic injury severity scores suffer from subjectivity, and may be computed only at relatively high man-hour expense. In this paper we present an injury severity ranking system termed the Anatomic Index, derived from objective, observed probabilities of mortality, and computable from the same HICDA diagnostic codes widely available in hospitals and through software in hospital computer systems. Mathematic underpinnings of the method, theoretical consequences of underprediction and overprediction of mortality, and advantages of the new Index are presented.
损伤严重程度量化系统对于损伤流行病学研究以及不同地区、患者组合和环境下医疗服务的比较评估至关重要。现有的解剖学损伤严重程度评分存在主观性,且计算成本相对较高,需要耗费较多工时。在本文中,我们提出了一种损伤严重程度排名系统,称为解剖学指数,它源自客观观察到的死亡率概率,可通过医院广泛使用的相同HICDA诊断代码以及医院计算机系统中的软件进行计算。本文介绍了该方法的数学基础、死亡率预测不足和过度预测的理论后果以及新指数的优势。