Laméris Wytze, van Randen Adrienne, Bipat Shandra, Bossuyt Patrick M M, Boermeester Marja A, Stoker Jaap
Department of Surgery, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Eur Radiol. 2008 Nov;18(11):2498-511. doi: 10.1007/s00330-008-1018-6. Epub 2008 Jun 4.
The purpose was to investigate the diagnostic accuracy of graded compression ultrasonography (US) and computed tomography (CT) in diagnosing acute colonic diverticulitis (ACD) in suspected patients. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of the accuracy of CT and US in diagnosing ACD. Study quality was assessed with the QUADAS tool. Summary estimates of sensitivity and specificity were calculated using a bivariate random effects model. Six US studies evaluated 630 patients, and eight CT studies evaluated 684 patients. Overall, their quality was moderate. We did not identify meaningful sources of heterogeneity in the study results. Summary sensitivity estimates were 92% (95% CI: 80%-97%) for US versus 94% (95%CI: 87%-97%) for CT (p = 0.65). Summary specificity estimates were 90% (95%CI: 82%-95%) for US versus 99% (95%CI: 90%-100%) for CT (p = 0.07). For the identification of alternative diseases sensitivity ranged between 33% and 78% for US and between 50% and 100% for CT. The currently best available evidence shows no statistically significant difference in accuracy of US and CT in diagnosing ACD. Therefore, both US and CT can be used as initial diagnostic tool until new evidence is brought forward. However, CT is more likely to identify alternative diseases.
目的是研究分级加压超声检查(US)和计算机断层扫描(CT)对疑似急性结肠憩室炎(ACD)患者的诊断准确性。我们对CT和US诊断ACD的准确性进行了系统评价和荟萃分析。采用QUADAS工具评估研究质量。使用双变量随机效应模型计算敏感性和特异性的汇总估计值。六项超声检查研究评估了630例患者,八项CT研究评估了684例患者。总体而言,其质量中等。我们未在研究结果中发现有意义的异质性来源。超声检查的汇总敏感性估计值为92%(95%CI:80%-97%),而CT为94%(95%CI:87%-97%)(p = 0.65)。超声检查的汇总特异性估计值为90%(95%CI:82%-95%),而CT为99%(95%CI:90%-100%)(p = 0.07)。对于鉴别其他疾病,超声检查的敏感性在33%至78%之间,CT在50%至100%之间。目前可得的最佳证据表明,超声检查和CT在诊断ACD的准确性方面无统计学显著差异。因此,在有新证据提出之前,超声检查和CT均可作为初始诊断工具。然而,CT更有可能鉴别出其他疾病。