de Chirinos S M, Lichtiger B
Section of Transfusion Medicine and Laboratory Immunology, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston 77030.
Sangre (Barc). 1991 Feb;36(1):43-6.
Two tests for detecting red cell alloantibodies in pre-transfusion studies were compared. Saline test is a well-known and recognized method, although it has a disadvantage: the 30 minutes incubation time at 37 degrees C can become a problem in emergencies. In such cases a method as quick as polybrene manual test (PMT), as recommended by the American Association of Blood Banks (AABB) Manual, seems the method of choice. So, in spite of the good results attained by us with the saline test, both methods were subjected to comparison. The results achieved with the saline test were better than with the PMT since this last failed to detected one anti-D, two anti-E and two anti-K antibodies, plus a warm antibody of undetermined specificity. All the antibodies not detected by PMT have clinical significance, so we decided not to use PMT in routine pre-transfusion testing.
对输血前研究中检测红细胞同种抗体的两种试验进行了比较。盐水试验是一种广为人知且公认的方法,尽管它有一个缺点:在37摄氏度下孵育30分钟在紧急情况下可能会成为问题。在这种情况下,美国血库协会(AABB)手册推荐的像聚凝胺手工试验(PMT)那样快速的方法似乎是首选方法。所以,尽管我们用盐水试验取得了良好结果,但还是对这两种方法进行了比较。盐水试验取得的结果比PMT更好,因为PMT未能检测到一种抗-D、两种抗-E和两种抗-K抗体,以及一种特异性未确定的温抗体。所有未被PMT检测到的抗体都具有临床意义,所以我们决定在常规输血前检测中不使用PMT。