Gawin Magdalena
The Tadeusz Manteuffel Institute of History, Polish Academy of Sciences, Rynek Starego Miasta 29/31, 00-272 Warsaw, Poland.
Stud Hist Philos Biol Biomed Sci. 2008 Jun;39(2):181-6. doi: 10.1016/j.shpsc.2008.03.001. Epub 2008 May 16.
This paper focuses on the relations between a liberal group of sex reformers, consisting of writers and literary critics, and physicians from the Polish Eugenics Society in interwar Poland. It illustrates the paradoxes of the mutual co-operation between these two groups during the 1930s and analyses the reason why compulsory sterilisation was rejected by politicians. From the early 1930s two movements began to forge an alliance in Poland: the sexual reform movement which advocated freedom of the individual, and eugenics, which called for limiting the freedom of the individual for the collective good. This paper draws attention to several issues which emerged as part of this collaboration: population politics, the relationship between reformers, eugenicists and state institutions, and the question of how both movements--eugenics and sexual reform--perceived the question of sexuality, birth control and abortion. It will also focus on those aspects of their thinking that led to mutual co-operation.
本文聚焦于两次世界大战之间波兰的一个由作家和文学评论家组成的自由性改革者团体与波兰优生学会的医生之间的关系。它阐述了20世纪30年代这两个团体相互合作中存在的矛盾,并分析了政治家拒绝强制绝育的原因。从20世纪30年代初开始,波兰有两个运动开始结成联盟:倡导个人自由的性改革运动和主张为了集体利益限制个人自由的优生学运动。本文关注了作为这种合作一部分而出现的几个问题:人口政治、改革者、优生学家与国家机构之间的关系,以及优生学和性改革这两个运动如何看待性、节育和堕胎问题。它还将关注导致他们相互合作的那些思想方面。