Moojen Dirk Jan F, Hentenaar Bram, Charles Vogely H, Verbout Abraham J, Castelein René M, Dhert Wouter J A
Department of Orthopaedics, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
J Arthroplasty. 2008 Dec;23(8):1152-6. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2007.08.020. Epub 2008 Mar 4.
The efficacy and benefits of high-dose antibiotic cement spacers compared with beads in the treatment of an infected prosthesis have been shown. However, in clinical practice, commercial, low-dose antibiotic bone cement is often used. This study investigated the in vitro antibiotic release of hip spacers made from Refobacin-Palacos-R or Antibiotic-Simplex-P cement compared with Septopal beads. Antibiotic concentrations were measured during 6 weeks. All carriers showed a burst release, but spacers showed little additional release after the first week. Cumulative release was 27.5 +/- 2.3 mg for Palacos, 23.8 +/- 0.2 mg for Simplex, and 188.3 +/- 9.3 mg for Septopal (P < .001). Despite the efficacy of high-dose antibiotic bone cement spacers, we believe one should be cautious toward using low-dose antibiotic bone cement for spacers because this could result in an unsuccessful eradication of infection.
已表明与含抗生素珠粒相比,高剂量抗生素骨水泥间隔物在治疗感染性假体方面的疗效和益处。然而,在临床实践中,通常使用商业性低剂量抗生素骨水泥。本研究调查了与Septopal珠粒相比,由Refobacin-Palacos-R或Antibiotic-Simplex-P骨水泥制成的髋关节间隔物的体外抗生素释放情况。在6周内测量抗生素浓度。所有载体均呈现突发释放,但间隔物在第一周后几乎没有额外释放。Palacos的累积释放量为27.5±2.3mg,Simplex为23.8±0.2mg,Septopal为188.3±9.3mg(P<.001)。尽管高剂量抗生素骨水泥间隔物有效,但我们认为对于使用低剂量抗生素骨水泥作为间隔物应谨慎,因为这可能导致感染无法根除。