• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

大龄儿童屈光参差性弱视遮盖疗法与阿托品压抑疗法的临床试验

Clinical trial of patching versus atropine penalization for the treatment of anisometropic amblyopia in older children.

作者信息

Menon Vimla, Shailesh Gadaginamath, Sharma Pradeep, Saxena Rohit

机构信息

Department of Ophthalmology, Dr. Rajendra Prasad Centre for Ophthalmic Sciences, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.

出版信息

J AAPOS. 2008 Oct;12(5):493-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jaapos.2008.03.006. Epub 2008 Jun 5.

DOI:10.1016/j.jaapos.2008.03.006
PMID:18534880
Abstract

PURPOSE

To compare conventional patching therapy with atropine penalization in the treatment of anisometropic amblyopia.

METHODS

Prospective, randomized, institution-based clinical trial of patching versus atropine penalization in patients aged 8-20 years. Patients received either conventional, full-time patching, or atropine penalization.

RESULTS

Fifty-seven patients were enrolled, with visual acuity ranging from 6/12 to 6/60 in the amblyopic eye. Twenty-nine patients received conventional full-time patching; 28 received atropine penalization. At 6 months, visual acuity improved by 2.38 lines in the conventional patching group and 2.34 lines in the atropine group (p = 0.889). The speed of visual recovery was faster in the patching group (3.7 months) than in the atropine group (4.7 months; p = 0.013). There was significant improvement in near vision and contrast sensitivity in both groups, but improvement in the patching group was significantly better than in the atropine group. No patient had reduced visual acuity in the unaffected eye. Redness of eyes was observed more in the atropine group than in the patching group. Treatment tended to be better-accepted by parents and patients in the atropine group, but not significantly more.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients aged 8-20 years with anisometropic amblyopia, both patching and atropine therapy improved visual acuity. Although recovery was faster with patching, the 2 modalities of treatment appeared to be equally effective.

摘要

目的

比较传统遮盖疗法与阿托品压抑疗法治疗屈光参差性弱视的效果。

方法

对8至20岁患者进行基于机构的前瞻性随机临床试验,比较遮盖疗法与阿托品压抑疗法。患者分别接受传统的全天遮盖或阿托品压抑疗法。

结果

共纳入57例患者,弱视眼视力范围为6/12至6/60。29例患者接受传统全天遮盖;28例接受阿托品压抑疗法。6个月时,传统遮盖组视力提高2.38行,阿托品组提高2.34行(p = 0.889)。遮盖组视力恢复速度(3.7个月)快于阿托品组(4.7个月;p = 0.013)。两组近视力和对比敏感度均有显著改善,但遮盖组改善明显优于阿托品组。未发现患者非弱视眼视力下降。阿托品组眼部发红情况比遮盖组更常见。阿托品组家长和患者对治疗的接受度倾向于更高,但差异无统计学意义。

结论

对于8至20岁的屈光参差性弱视患者,遮盖疗法和阿托品疗法均能提高视力。虽然遮盖疗法视力恢复更快,但两种治疗方式似乎同样有效。

相似文献

1
Clinical trial of patching versus atropine penalization for the treatment of anisometropic amblyopia in older children.大龄儿童屈光参差性弱视遮盖疗法与阿托品压抑疗法的临床试验
J AAPOS. 2008 Oct;12(5):493-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jaapos.2008.03.006. Epub 2008 Jun 5.
2
Atropine vs patching for treatment of moderate amblyopia: follow-up at 15 years of age of a randomized clinical trial.阿托品与遮盖疗法治疗中度弱视的比较:一项随机临床试验15岁时的随访
JAMA Ophthalmol. 2014 Jul;132(7):799-805. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2014.392.
3
Randomized trial of treatment of amblyopia in children aged 7 to 17 years.7至17岁儿童弱视治疗的随机试验。
Arch Ophthalmol. 2005 Apr;123(4):437-47. doi: 10.1001/archopht.123.4.437.
4
A randomized trial of atropine vs. patching for treatment of moderate amblyopia in children.阿托品与眼罩治疗儿童中度弱视的随机试验。
Arch Ophthalmol. 2002 Mar;120(3):268-78. doi: 10.1001/archopht.120.3.268.
5
Two-year follow-up of a 6-month randomized trial of atropine vs patching for treatment of moderate amblyopia in children.一项针对儿童中度弱视治疗的阿托品与遮盖疗法为期6个月的随机试验的两年随访。
Arch Ophthalmol. 2005 Feb;123(2):149-57. doi: 10.1001/archopht.123.2.149.
6
Comparative efficacy of penalization methods in moderate to mild amblyopia.中度至轻度弱视中惩罚方法的比较疗效
Am J Ophthalmol. 2008 Mar;145(3):562-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2007.10.029. Epub 2008 Jan 22.
7
Patching vs atropine to treat amblyopia in children aged 7 to 12 years: a randomized trial.眼罩疗法与阿托品治疗7至12岁儿童弱视的随机试验
Arch Ophthalmol. 2008 Dec;126(12):1634-42. doi: 10.1001/archophthalmol.2008.107.
8
A comparison of atropine and patching treatments for moderate amblyopia by patient age, cause of amblyopia, depth of amblyopia, and other factors.根据患者年龄、弱视病因、弱视程度及其他因素,对阿托品和遮盖疗法治疗中度弱视的比较。
Ophthalmology. 2003 Aug;110(8):1632-7; discussion 1637-8. doi: 10.1016/S0161-6420(03)00500-1.
9
Compliance and patching and atropine amblyopia treatments.依从性、配镜及阿托品弱视治疗。
Vision Res. 2015 Sep;114:31-40. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2015.02.012. Epub 2015 Mar 2.
10
A randomized trial of atropine vs patching for treatment of moderate amblyopia: follow-up at age 10 years.阿托品与眼罩治疗中度弱视的随机试验:10岁时的随访
Arch Ophthalmol. 2008 Aug;126(8):1039-44. doi: 10.1001/archopht.126.8.1039.

引用本文的文献

1
Prospective observational study of three real-world amblyopia treatments in children: clinical outcomes and predictive factors.儿童三种现实世界中弱视治疗方法的前瞻性观察研究:临床结果和预测因素。
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2025 Jul 31. doi: 10.1007/s00417-025-06913-7.
2
Comparison of novel clinic-based approach (amblyopia school) Vs. home-based occlusion for amblyopia therapy - A retrospective study.新型基于临床的方法(弱视学校)与家庭遮盖治疗弱视的比较-回顾性研究。
Indian J Ophthalmol. 2023 May;71(5):2094-2099. doi: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_1097_22.
3
Amblyopia and the whole child.
弱视与儿童整体发展。
Prog Retin Eye Res. 2023 Mar;93:101168. doi: 10.1016/j.preteyeres.2023.101168. Epub 2023 Feb 1.
4
Perceptual learning with hand - eye coordination as an effective tool for managing amblyopia: A prospective study.手眼协调的知觉学习作为管理弱视的有效工具:一项前瞻性研究。
Indian J Ophthalmol. 2022 Oct;70(10):3630-3633. doi: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_852_22.
5
Management of amblyopia in pediatric patients: Current insights.儿童弱视的管理:当前的认识。
Eye (Lond). 2022 Jan;36(1):44-56. doi: 10.1038/s41433-021-01669-w. Epub 2021 Jul 7.
6
The Effects of 0.01% Atropine on Adult Myopes' Contrast Sensitivity.0.01%阿托品对成年近视患者对比敏感度的影响。
Front Neurosci. 2021 Feb 19;15:624472. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2021.624472. eCollection 2021.
7
Efficacy of interventions for amblyopia: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.干预弱视的疗效:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
BMC Ophthalmol. 2020 May 25;20(1):203. doi: 10.1186/s12886-020-01442-9.
8
National consensus statement regarding pediatric eye examination, refraction, and amblyopia management.关于儿科眼科检查、验光和弱视管理的国家共识声明。
Indian J Ophthalmol. 2020 Feb;68(2):325-332. doi: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_471_19.
9
Conventional occlusion versus pharmacologic penalization for amblyopia.传统遮盖法与药物压抑法治疗弱视的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Aug 28;8(8):CD006460. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006460.pub3.
10
Simplified updates on the pathophysiology and recent developments in the treatment of amblyopia: A review.弱视的病理生理学简化更新及近期治疗进展综述。
Indian J Ophthalmol. 2019 Sep;67(9):1392-1399. doi: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_11_19.