Suppr超能文献

中空纤维膜过滤器和活性炭过滤器都不能去除氟化自来水中的氟化物。

Neither hollow-fibre membrane filters nor activated-charcoal filters remove fluoride from fluoridated tap water.

作者信息

Konno Hideki, Yaegaki Ken, Tanaka Tomoko, Sato Tsutomu, Itai Kazuyoshi, Imai Toshio, Murata Takatoshi, Herai Mayumi

机构信息

Department of oral health, School of Life Dentistry at Tokyo, Nippon Dental University,Tokyo, Japan.

出版信息

J Can Dent Assoc. 2008 Jun;74(5):443.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Previous reports of the reduction of fluoride concentrations in fluoridated water by domestic water treatment systems have indicated that further supplementation with fluoride is required. However, the absorption of fluoride by filters has not yet been directly identified. If these filters do not absorb fluoride, further fluoride supplementation may increase fluorosis. In this study, we determined whether filtering systems absorb fluoride ions.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We directly measured the amounts of fluoride absorbed by activated-carbon filters or hollow-fibre membrane filters using pyrohydrolysis of the filters and flow-injection analysis, the sensitivity of which is more than 100 times greater than that of conventional methods. We made fluoride solutions of pure or tap water and determined changes in fluoride concentration as a result of filtering with a fluoride electrode.

RESULTS

Hollow-fibre membrane filters did not affect fluoride concentrations in the fluoridated water, but activated-carbon filters removed some fluoride, especially from the pure-water solution. Filtering a pure-water solution with a fluoride concentration of 0.8 mg F/L reduced the fluoride concentration until 210 L of the solution had been filtered. However, filtering a tap-water solution of 0.8 mg F/L reduced the fluoride concentration only until 8 L had been filtered. The concentration of absorbed fluoride in the filter at 10 L of filtration was 4.7 mg/kg activated carbon.

CONCLUSION

Further fluoride supplementation of fluoridated water should not be necessary, regardless of whether an activated-carbon or hollow-fibre membrane filter is installed on a domestic water treatment system.

摘要

背景与目的

先前关于家用水处理系统降低氟化水中氟化物浓度的报告表明,仍需进一步补充氟化物。然而,过滤器对氟化物的吸收尚未得到直接确认。如果这些过滤器不吸收氟化物,进一步补充氟化物可能会增加氟中毒的风险。在本研究中,我们确定了过滤系统是否吸收氟离子。

材料与方法

我们使用过滤器的热解和流动注射分析法直接测量了活性炭过滤器或中空纤维膜过滤器吸收的氟化物量,该方法的灵敏度比传统方法高100倍以上。我们制备了纯水或自来水的氟化物溶液,并使用氟电极测定过滤后氟化物浓度的变化。

结果

中空纤维膜过滤器对氟化水中的氟化物浓度没有影响,但活性炭过滤器去除了一些氟化物,尤其是从纯水溶液中。用氟化物浓度为0.8mg F/L的纯水溶液进行过滤,在过滤210L溶液之前,氟化物浓度一直降低。然而,用氟化物浓度为0.8mg F/L的自来水溶液进行过滤,在过滤8L溶液后氟化物浓度就不再降低。在过滤10L时,过滤器中吸收的氟化物浓度为4.7mg/kg活性炭。

结论

无论家用水处理系统上安装的是活性炭过滤器还是中空纤维膜过滤器,氟化水都无需进一步补充氟化物。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验