Babor Thomas F
Department of Community Medicine and Health Care, University of Connecticut School of Medicine, Farmington, CT 06030-6325, USA.
Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2008 Jun;17 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S45-9. doi: 10.1002/mpr.248.
This article describes two major studies (i.e. Project MATCH and the US Department of Veterans Affair Effectiveness Study) of mediators and moderators of drinking behavior change following treatment, and considers alternatives to the dominant paradigm that has guided treatment research for more than two decades. Both studies were designed to test the "Technology Model" of therapeutic change, which postulates that patient attributes and treatment process elements, respectively, constitute mediators and moderators of change in drinking and drug use following treatment. The studies show that matching to therapeutic orientation is not an essential ingredient to substantially enhanced outcomes, as previously believed. They also indicate that the mediational mechanisms underlying several of the most popular therapies are different than what is suggested by their proponents. The inability of the Technology Model to explain, much less improve, the effectiveness of addiction treatment suggests the need for a new paradigm. It may be more fruitful to look for matching in larger populations at the level of communities or treatment systems, where a wider range of settings and therapeutic interventions can be evaluated.
本文介绍了两项关于治疗后饮酒行为改变的调节因素和中介因素的主要研究(即匹配项目和美国退伍军人事务部有效性研究),并探讨了替代主导范式的方法,该范式指导治疗研究已超过二十年。两项研究均旨在检验治疗性改变的“技术模型”,该模型假定患者属性和治疗过程要素分别构成治疗后饮酒和药物使用改变的中介因素和调节因素。研究表明,与治疗取向相匹配并非如先前认为的那样是大幅提高治疗效果的关键因素。研究还表明,几种最流行疗法背后的中介机制与它们的支持者所提出的不同。技术模型无法解释成瘾治疗的有效性,更不用说提高其有效性了,这表明需要一种新的范式。在社区或治疗系统层面的更大人群中寻找匹配可能更有成效,在那里可以评估更广泛的环境和治疗干预措施。