Conrod P J, Stewart S H, Pihl R O, Côté S, Fontaine V, Dongier M
Department of Psychology, State University of New York at Stony Brook 11794-2500, USA.
Psychol Addict Behav. 2000 Sep;14(3):231-42. doi: 10.1037//0893-164x.14.3.231.
Female substance abusers recruited from the community were randomly assigned to receive 1 of 3 brief interventions that differentially targeted their personality and reasons for drug use. The 90-min interventions were: (a) a motivation-matched intervention involving personality-specific motivational and coping skills training, (b) a motivational control intervention involving a motivational film and a supportive discussion with a therapist, and (c) a motivation-mismatched intervention targeting a theoretically different personality profile. Assessment 6 months later (N = 198) indicated that only the matched intervention proved to be more effective than the motivational control intervention in reducing frequency and severity of problematic alcohol and drug use and preventing use of multiple medical services. These findings indicate promise for a client-treatment matching strategy that focuses on personality-specific motives for substance abuse.
从社区招募的女性药物滥用者被随机分配接受三种简短干预措施中的一种，这些干预措施分别针对她们的个性和吸毒原因。这90分钟的干预措施包括：(a) 动机匹配干预，包括针对个性的动机和应对技能训练；(b) 动机对照干预，包括观看一部励志电影并与治疗师进行支持性讨论；(c) 动机不匹配干预，针对理论上不同的个性特征。6个月后的评估（N = 198）表明，只有匹配干预在减少有问题的酒精和药物使用的频率和严重程度以及预防使用多种医疗服务方面比动机对照干预更有效。这些发现表明，一种关注药物滥用个性特定动机的客户-治疗匹配策略具有前景。
