Suppr超能文献

参与法庭监督下药物滥用治疗的高危罪犯:特征、接受的治疗以及与累犯相关的因素。

High-risk offenders participating in court-supervised substance abuse treatment: characteristics, treatment received, and factors associated with recidivism.

作者信息

Evans Elizabeth, Huang David, Hser Yih-Ing

机构信息

UCLA Integrated Substance Abuse Programs, Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior, Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine, 1640 S. Sepulveda Blvd, 200, Los Angeles, CA 90025, USA.

出版信息

J Behav Health Serv Res. 2011 Oct;38(4):510-25. doi: 10.1007/s11414-011-9241-3.

Abstract

High-risk offenders treated by California's Proposition 36 court-supervised drug treatment initiative account for a disproportionate number of re-arrests (Hawken 2008) undermining the many successes of the program, yet little is known about their characteristics, treatment experiences, or factors that influence re-arrest. To better understand this group, self-reported and administrative data were analyzed on 78 high-risk (five or more convictions in the previous 5 years) and 1,009 low-risk offenders enrolled during 2004. At intake, high-risk offenders were younger, more were male, and more had prior contact with psychiatric and criminal justice systems. Treatment received and the proportion recidivated during the 30-months after treatment assessment were similar across groups, but high-risk offenders had a greater number of re-arrests. The number of re-arrests was increased by high-risk classification, but decreased by receipt of more treatment services and longer treatment length. Moreover, the number of re-arrests was highest among high-risk offenders with shorter treatment lengths, whereas it was similar to that among low-risk offenders if treatment length was longer. To reduce recidivism among high-risk offenders in court-supervised drug treatment, consideration of psychiatric problems and criminal history is needed, as is receipt of sufficient treatment.

摘要

加利福尼亚州第36号提案规定的由法院监督的药物治疗倡议所处理的高危罪犯再次被捕的比例过高(霍肯,2008年),这损害了该项目所取得的诸多成功成果,但对于他们的特征、治疗经历或影响再次被捕的因素却知之甚少。为了更好地了解这一群体,对2004年登记在册的78名高危(过去5年有5次或更多次定罪)和1009名低危罪犯的自我报告数据和行政数据进行了分析。在入院时,高危罪犯更年轻,男性更多,并且更多人此前曾与精神科和刑事司法系统有过接触。各群体接受的治疗以及治疗评估后30个月内再次犯罪的比例相似,但高危罪犯再次被捕的次数更多。高危分类会增加再次被捕的次数,但接受更多治疗服务和更长治疗时长则会减少再次被捕的次数。此外,治疗时长较短的高危罪犯再次被捕的次数最多,而治疗时长较长时,其再次被捕次数与低危罪犯相似。为了减少法院监督的药物治疗中高危罪犯的累犯率,需要考虑精神问题和犯罪史,同时也需要接受足够的治疗。

相似文献

2
Treatment entry barriers among California's Proposition 36 offenders.
J Subst Abuse Treat. 2008 Dec;35(4):410-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2008.03.003. Epub 2008 Jun 2.
6
Client and program factors associated with dropout from court mandated drug treatment.
Eval Program Plann. 2009 Aug;32(3):204-12. doi: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2008.12.003. Epub 2008 Dec 11.
7
Integrated services plus drug treatment as a system alternative to crime control and parole.
Soc Work Public Health. 2012;27(7):687-98. doi: 10.1080/19371910903269570.
10

引用本文的文献

2
Holyoke Early Access to Recovery and Treatment (HEART): A case study of a court-based intervention to reduce opioid overdose.
J Ethn Subst Abuse. 2024 Oct-Dec;23(4):1039-1061. doi: 10.1080/15332640.2023.2172758. Epub 2023 Jan 30.
3
The Influence of Client Risks and Treatment Engagement on Recidivism.
J Offender Rehabil. 2013;52(8):544-564. doi: 10.1080/10509674.2013.840353. Epub 2013 Oct 28.
4
Gender as a moderator in predicting re-arrest among treated drug-involved offenders.
J Subst Abuse Treat. 2015 Feb;49:65-70. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2014.08.001. Epub 2014 Aug 7.
5
Criminal justice outcomes after engagement in outpatient substance abuse treatment.
J Subst Abuse Treat. 2014 Mar;46(3):295-305. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2013.10.005. Epub 2013 Oct 14.
6
Treating substance use disorders in the criminal justice system.
Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2013 Nov;15(11):414. doi: 10.1007/s11920-013-0414-z.

本文引用的文献

3
What are your priorities right now? Identifying service needs across recovery stages to inform service development.
J Subst Abuse Treat. 2010 Jan;38(1):51-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2009.06.003. Epub 2009 Jul 23.
4
Client and program factors associated with dropout from court mandated drug treatment.
Eval Program Plann. 2009 Aug;32(3):204-12. doi: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2008.12.003. Epub 2008 Dec 11.
6
Using administrative data for longitudinal substance abuse research.
J Behav Health Serv Res. 2010 Apr;37(2):252-71. doi: 10.1007/s11414-008-9125-3. Epub 2008 Aug 5.
7
Integrating substance abuse treatment and criminal justice supervision.
Sci Pract Perspect. 2003 Aug;2(1):4-14. doi: 10.1151/spp03214.
8
Treatment for persons with substance use disorders: mediators, moderators, and the need for a new research approach.
Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2008 Jun;17 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S45-9. doi: 10.1002/mpr.248.
9
Risk, Need, And Responsivity (RNR): It All Depends.
Crime Delinq. 2006;52(1):28-51. doi: 10.1177/0011128705281754.
10
Cross-system data linkage for treatment outcome evaluation: lessons learned from the California Treatment Outcome Project.
Eval Program Plann. 2008 May;31(2):125-35. doi: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2008.02.003. Epub 2008 Feb 19.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验