Evans Elizabeth, Huang David, Hser Yih-Ing
UCLA Integrated Substance Abuse Programs, Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior, Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine, 1640 S. Sepulveda Blvd, 200, Los Angeles, CA 90025, USA.
J Behav Health Serv Res. 2011 Oct;38(4):510-25. doi: 10.1007/s11414-011-9241-3.
High-risk offenders treated by California's Proposition 36 court-supervised drug treatment initiative account for a disproportionate number of re-arrests (Hawken 2008) undermining the many successes of the program, yet little is known about their characteristics, treatment experiences, or factors that influence re-arrest. To better understand this group, self-reported and administrative data were analyzed on 78 high-risk (five or more convictions in the previous 5 years) and 1,009 low-risk offenders enrolled during 2004. At intake, high-risk offenders were younger, more were male, and more had prior contact with psychiatric and criminal justice systems. Treatment received and the proportion recidivated during the 30-months after treatment assessment were similar across groups, but high-risk offenders had a greater number of re-arrests. The number of re-arrests was increased by high-risk classification, but decreased by receipt of more treatment services and longer treatment length. Moreover, the number of re-arrests was highest among high-risk offenders with shorter treatment lengths, whereas it was similar to that among low-risk offenders if treatment length was longer. To reduce recidivism among high-risk offenders in court-supervised drug treatment, consideration of psychiatric problems and criminal history is needed, as is receipt of sufficient treatment.
加利福尼亚州第36号提案规定的由法院监督的药物治疗倡议所处理的高危罪犯再次被捕的比例过高(霍肯,2008年),这损害了该项目所取得的诸多成功成果,但对于他们的特征、治疗经历或影响再次被捕的因素却知之甚少。为了更好地了解这一群体,对2004年登记在册的78名高危(过去5年有5次或更多次定罪)和1009名低危罪犯的自我报告数据和行政数据进行了分析。在入院时,高危罪犯更年轻,男性更多,并且更多人此前曾与精神科和刑事司法系统有过接触。各群体接受的治疗以及治疗评估后30个月内再次犯罪的比例相似,但高危罪犯再次被捕的次数更多。高危分类会增加再次被捕的次数,但接受更多治疗服务和更长治疗时长则会减少再次被捕的次数。此外,治疗时长较短的高危罪犯再次被捕的次数最多,而治疗时长较长时,其再次被捕次数与低危罪犯相似。为了减少法院监督的药物治疗中高危罪犯的累犯率,需要考虑精神问题和犯罪史,同时也需要接受足够的治疗。