Salafsky Nick, Salzer Daniel, Stattersfield Alison J, Hilton-Taylor Craig, Neugarten Rachel, Butchart Stuart H M, Collen Ben, Cox Neil, Master Lawrence L, O'Connor Sheila, Wilkie David
Foundations of Success, 4109 Maryland Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20816-2606, USA.
Conserv Biol. 2008 Aug;22(4):897-911. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2008.00937.x. Epub 2008 Jun 9.
An essential foundation of any science is a standard lexicon. Any given conservation project can be described in terms of the biodiversity targets, direct threats, contributing factors at the project site, and the conservation actions that the project team is employing to change the situation. These common elements can be linked in a causal chain, which represents a theory of change about how the conservation actions are intended to bring about desired project outcomes. If project teams want to describe and share their work and learn from one another, they need a standard and precise lexicon to specifically describe each node along this chain. To date, there have been several independent efforts to develop standard classifications for the direct threats that affect biodiversity and the conservation actions required to counteract these threats. Recognizing that it is far more effective to have only one accepted global scheme, we merged these separate efforts into unified classifications of threats and actions, which we present here. Each classification is a hierarchical listing of terms and associated definitions. The classifications are comprehensive and exclusive at the upper levels of the hierarchy, expandable at the lower levels, and simple, consistent, and scalable at all levels. We tested these classifications by applying them post hoc to 1191 threatened bird species and 737 conservation projects. Almost all threats and actions could be assigned to the new classification systems, save for some cases lacking detailed information. Furthermore, the new classification systems provided an improved way of analyzing and comparing information across projects when compared with earlier systems. We believe that widespread adoption of these classifications will help practitioners more systematically identify threats and appropriate actions, managers to more efficiently set priorities and allocate resources, and most important, facilitate cross-project learning and the development of a systematic science of conservation.
任何一门科学的重要基础都是标准词汇表。任何一个特定的保护项目都可以从生物多样性目标、直接威胁、项目所在地的促成因素以及项目团队为改变现状而采取的保护行动等方面进行描述。这些共同要素可以在一个因果链中联系起来,这代表了一种关于保护行动如何旨在实现预期项目成果的变革理论。如果项目团队想要描述和分享他们的工作并相互学习,他们需要一个标准且精确的词汇表来具体描述这条链上的每个节点。迄今为止,已经有几项独立的工作致力于为影响生物多样性的直接威胁以及应对这些威胁所需的保护行动制定标准分类。认识到只有一个被广泛接受的全球方案会更有效,我们将这些单独的工作合并为威胁和行动的统一分类,在此呈现给大家。每个分类都是一个术语及其相关定义的分层列表。这些分类在层次结构的较高层级是全面且排他的,在较低层级是可扩展的,并且在所有层级都是简单、一致且可扩展的。我们通过事后将这些分类应用于1191种受威胁鸟类和737个保护项目来对其进行测试。几乎所有的威胁和行动都可以被归入新的分类系统,除了一些缺乏详细信息的情况。此外,与早期系统相比,新的分类系统提供了一种改进的方式来分析和比较不同项目的信息。我们相信,这些分类的广泛采用将有助于从业者更系统地识别威胁和适当行动,帮助管理者更有效地确定优先事项和分配资源,最重要的是,促进跨项目学习以及系统保护科学的发展。
Am J Primatol. 2010-5
Conserv Biol. 2010-10
Conserv Biol. 2009-8
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2025-5
Conserv Biol. 2025-8
BMC Vet Res. 2025-2-8