• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

氯尼辛赖氨酸与安乃近用于严重偏头痛急性治疗的比较:一项单盲随机研究。

Lysine clonixinate versus dipyrone (metamizole) for the acute treatment of severe migraine attacks: a single-blind, randomized study.

作者信息

Krymchantowski Abouch Valenty, Carneiro Henrique, Barbosa Jackeline, Jevoux Carla

机构信息

Headache Center of Rio, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.

出版信息

Arq Neuropsiquiatr. 2008 Jun;66(2A):216-20. doi: 10.1590/s0004-282x2008000200015.

DOI:10.1590/s0004-282x2008000200015
PMID:18545786
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID) are effective to treat migraine attacks. Lysine clonixinate (LC) and dipyrone (metamizol) have been proven effective to treat acute migraine. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of the intravenous formulations of LC and dipyrone in the treatment of severe migraine attacks.

METHOD

Thirty patients (28 women, 2 men), aged 18 to 48 years with migraine according the International Headache Society (IHS) (2004) were studied. The patients were randomized into 2 groups when presenting to an emergency department with a severe migraine attack. The study was single-blind. Headache intensity, nausea, photophobia and side effects were evaluated at 0, 30, 60 and 90 minutes after the drug administration. Rectal indomethacin as rescue medication (RM) was available after 2 hours and its use compared between groups.

RESULTS

All patients completed the study. At 30 minutes, 0% of the dipyrone group 13% of the LC group were pain free (p=0.46). At 60 and 90 minutes, 2 (13%) and 5 (33%) patients from the dipyrone group and 11 (73%) and 13 (86.7%) patients from the LC group were pain free (p<0.001). At 60 minutes, significantly more patients from the LC group were nausea-free (p<0.001). Regarding photophobia, there were no differences between groups at 60 minutes (p=0.11). The use of RM at 2 hours did not differ among groups (p=0.50). Pain in the site of the injection was reported by more patients of the LC group compared to the dipyrone group (p<0.0001).

CONCLUSION

LC is significantly superior to dipyrone in treating severe migraine attacks. LC promotes significantly more burning at the site of the injection.

摘要

背景与目的

非甾体抗炎药(NSAID)对治疗偏头痛发作有效。氯尼辛赖氨酸(LC)和安乃近已被证实对治疗急性偏头痛有效。本研究的目的是评估LC和安乃近静脉制剂治疗重度偏头痛发作的疗效和耐受性。

方法

研究了30例年龄在18至48岁、符合国际头痛协会(IHS)(2004年)偏头痛诊断标准的患者(28名女性,2名男性)。当这些患者因重度偏头痛发作到急诊科就诊时,被随机分为2组。该研究为单盲研究。在给药后0、30、60和90分钟评估头痛强度、恶心、畏光和副作用。2小时后可使用直肠吲哚美辛作为急救药物(RM),并比较两组的使用情况。

结果

所有患者均完成研究。30分钟时,安乃近组0%、LC组13%的患者疼痛消失(p = 0.46)。60和90分钟时,安乃近组分别有2例(13%)和5例(33%)患者、LC组分别有11例(73%)和13例(86.7%)患者疼痛消失(p < 0.001)。60分钟时,LC组无恶心症状的患者明显更多(p < 0.001)。关于畏光,60分钟时两组之间无差异(p = 0.11)。2小时时RM的使用在两组之间无差异(p = 0.50)。与安乃近组相比,LC组更多患者报告注射部位疼痛(p < 0.0001)。

结论

在治疗重度偏头痛发作方面,LC明显优于安乃近。LC在注射部位引起的烧灼感明显更多。

相似文献

1
Lysine clonixinate versus dipyrone (metamizole) for the acute treatment of severe migraine attacks: a single-blind, randomized study.氯尼辛赖氨酸与安乃近用于严重偏头痛急性治疗的比较:一项单盲随机研究。
Arq Neuropsiquiatr. 2008 Jun;66(2A):216-20. doi: 10.1590/s0004-282x2008000200015.
2
Lysine clonixinate vs naproxen sodium for the acute treatment of migraine: a double-blind, randomized, crossover study.氯尼辛赖氨酸与萘普生钠用于偏头痛急性治疗的双盲、随机、交叉研究。
MedGenMed. 2005 Dec 14;7(4):69.
3
[Intravenous lysine clonixinate for the treatment of migraine: an open pilot study].静脉注射赖氨酸氯尼辛酯治疗偏头痛:一项开放性初步研究
Arq Neuropsiquiatr. 1999 Sep;57(3A):606-9. doi: 10.1590/s0004-282x1999000400011.
4
Oral lysine clonixinate in the acute treatment of migraine: a double-blind placebo-controlled study.口服赖氨酸氯尼辛酯治疗偏头痛急性发作:一项双盲安慰剂对照研究。
Arq Neuropsiquiatr. 2001 Mar;59(1):46-9. doi: 10.1590/s0004-282x2001000100010.
5
Intravenous lysine clonixinate for the acute treatment of severe migraine attacks: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study.静脉注射赖氨酸氯尼辛酯用于严重偏头痛发作的急性治疗:一项双盲、随机、安慰剂对照研究。
Curr Ther Res Clin Exp. 2003 Sep;64(8):505-13. doi: 10.1016/j.curtheres.2003.08.008.
6
The efficacy and safety of dipyrone (Novalgin) tablets in the treatment of acute migraine attacks: a double-blind, cross-over, randomized, placebo-controlled, multi-center study.安乃近片治疗急性偏头痛发作的疗效与安全性:一项双盲、交叉、随机、安慰剂对照、多中心研究。
Funct Neurol. 2004 Jul-Sep;19(3):197-202.
7
Analgesic efficacy of lysine clonixinate, paracetamol and dipyrone in lower third molar extraction: a randomized controlled trial.
Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2009 Aug 1;14(8):e411-5.
8
[Comparison of intravenous dipyrone to intravenous metoclopramide in the treatment of acute crisis of migraine: randomized clinical trial].静脉注射安乃近与静脉注射胃复安治疗偏头痛急性发作的比较:随机临床试验
Arq Neuropsiquiatr. 2006 Dec;64(4):1005-8. doi: 10.1590/s0004-282x2006000600023.
9
Acute treatment of migraine attacks: efficacy and safety of a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug, diclofenac-potassium, in comparison to oral sumatriptan and placebo. The Diclofenac-K/Sumatriptan Migraine Study Group.偏头痛发作的急性治疗:与口服舒马曲坦和安慰剂相比,非甾体抗炎药双氯芬酸钾的疗效和安全性。双氯芬酸钾/舒马曲坦偏头痛研究组
Cephalalgia. 1999 May;19(4):232-40. doi: 10.1046/j.1468-2982.1999.019004232.x.
10
Comparison of intravenous valproate with intravenous lysine-acetylsalicylic acid in acute migraine attacks.急性偏头痛发作时静脉注射丙戊酸盐与静脉注射赖氨酸-乙酰水杨酸的比较。
Headache. 2005 Jan;45(1):42-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4610.2005.05009.x.

引用本文的文献

1
A new solvate of clonixin and a comparison of the two clonixin solvates.氯尼辛的一种新溶剂化物及两种氯尼辛溶剂化物的比较。
RSC Adv. 2021 Jul 16;11(40):24836-24842. doi: 10.1039/d1ra03623h. eCollection 2021 Jul 13.
2
Metamizole-associated adverse events: a systematic review and meta-analysis.甲灭酸相关不良反应:系统评价和荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2015 Apr 13;10(4):e0122918. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0122918. eCollection 2015.
3
Are the current IHS guidelines for migraine drug trials being followed?当前国际头痛协会(IHS)关于偏头痛药物试验的指南是否得到遵循?
J Headache Pain. 2010 Dec;11(6):457-68. doi: 10.1007/s10194-010-0257-5. Epub 2010 Oct 8.