Sullivan Mark D, Edlund Mark J, Fan Ming-Yu, DeVries Andrea, Braden Jennifer Brennan, Martin Bradley C
Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Division of Consultation-Liaison Psychiatry, University of Washington, Box 356560, 1959 NE Pacific Street, Seattle, WA 98195-6560, USA Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, USA College of Pharmacy, Division of Pharmaceutical Evaluation and Policy, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, USA HealthCore, 800 Delaware Avenue, Fifth Floor, Wilmington, DE, USA.
Pain. 2008 Aug 31;138(2):440-449. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2008.04.027. Epub 2008 Jun 10.
Opioids are widely prescribed for non-cancer pain conditions (NCPC), but there have been no large observational studies in actual clinical practice assessing patterns of opioid use over extended periods of time. The TROUP (Trends and Risks of Opioid Use for Pain) study reports on trends in opioid therapy for NCPC in two disparate populations, one national and commercially insured population (HealthCore plan data) and one state-based and publicly-insured (Arkansas Medicaid) population over a six year period (2000-2005). We track enrollees with the four most common NCPC conditions: arthritis/joint pain, back pain, neck pain, headaches, as well as HIV/AIDS. Rates of NCPC diagnosis and opioid use increased linearly during this period in both groups, with the Medicaid group starting at higher rates and the HealthCore group increasing more rapidly. The proportion of enrollees receiving NCPC diagnoses increased (HealthCore 33%, Medicaid 9%), as did the proportion of enrollees with NCPC diagnoses who received opioids (HealthCore 58%, Medicaid 29%). Cumulative yearly opioid dose (in mg. morphine equivalents) received by NCPC patients treated with opioids increased (HealthCore 38%, Medicaid 37%) due to increases in number of days supplied rather than dose per day supplied. Use of short-acting Drug Enforcement Administration Schedule II opioids increased most rapidly, both in proportion of NCPC patients treated (HealthCore 54%, Medicaid 38%) and in cumulative yearly dose (HealthCore 95%, Medicaid 191%). These trends have occurred without any significant change in the underlying population prevalence of NCPC or new evidence of the efficacy of long-term opioid therapy and thus likely represent a broad-based shift in opioid treatment philosophy.
阿片类药物被广泛用于治疗非癌性疼痛病症(NCPC),但在实际临床实践中,尚未有大规模观察性研究评估长期阿片类药物的使用模式。TROUP(疼痛阿片类药物使用趋势与风险)研究报告了在六年期间(2000 - 2005年),两个不同人群中NCPC阿片类药物治疗的趋势,一个是全国性商业保险人群(HealthCore计划数据),另一个是州立公共保险人群(阿肯色州医疗补助)。我们追踪患有四种最常见NCPC病症的参保人:关节炎/关节疼痛、背痛、颈痛、头痛,以及艾滋病毒/艾滋病。在此期间,两组中NCPC诊断率和阿片类药物使用率均呈线性上升,医疗补助组起始率较高,而HealthCore组上升更快。接受NCPC诊断的参保人比例增加了(HealthCore组为33%,医疗补助组为9%),接受阿片类药物治疗的NCPC诊断参保人比例也增加了(HealthCore组为58%,医疗补助组为29%)。接受阿片类药物治疗的NCPC患者每年累计阿片类药物剂量(以毫克吗啡当量计)增加了(HealthCore组为38%,医疗补助组为37%),这是由于供应天数增加而非每日供应剂量增加。短效美国药品管理局二类阿片类药物的使用增长最为迅速,无论是接受治疗的NCPC患者比例(HealthCore组为54%,医疗补助组为38%)还是每年累计剂量(HealthCore组为95%,医疗补助组为191%)。这些趋势在NCPC潜在人群患病率没有任何显著变化或长期阿片类药物治疗疗效没有新证据的情况下出现,因此可能代表了阿片类药物治疗理念的广泛转变。