• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

研究门诊“急救”疗法对急性偏头痛的效用。

Examining the utility of in-clinic "rescue" therapy for acute migraine.

作者信息

Morey Veronica, Rothrock John F

机构信息

Department of Neurology, University of South Alabama, Mobile, AL, USA.

出版信息

Headache. 2008 Jun;48(6):939-43. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4610.2008.01165.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1526-4610.2008.01165.x
PMID:18549372
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Management options currently are limited for patients with acute migraine whose symptoms prove refractory to self-administered therapy.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the clinical utility and cost-effectiveness of a management program offering in-clinic "rescue" treatment for patients with acute migraine.

METHODS

Two hundred consecutive migraine patients presenting to a university-based headache clinic were randomized to receive either optimal self-administered medical therapy for acute migraine ("standard therapy") or similar therapy plus the option of in-clinic parenteral drug administration should self-administered therapy prove ineffective ("rescue therapy"). Patients randomized to the latter group were restricted to a maximum of 2 "rescue visits" per month, and all patients were followed for one year. Patients "rescued" in clinic were contacted by telephone 24 hours following treatment to evaluate their treatment response. The primary analysis involved a comparison of the number of emergency department (ED) visits for headache recorded within each group over the one-year period of study. For all ED visits in the rescue group and for a randomly selected and equal number of ED visits within the standard group, the direct costs associated with those visits were assessed, and the direct costs of all in-clinic rescue visits also were recorded and analyzed.

RESULTS

The 2 groups studied were similar in terms of age, gender ratio, migraine subtype, migraine-related disability status at baseline and type/extent of medical insurance coverage. Over the one-year study period, the rescue group recorded 423 in-clinic rescue visits and reported 27 ED visits for headache treatment. The standard therapy group reported 73 ED visits (27 vs 73 visits; P < .01). The total direct costs associated with ED visits were $45,330 for the rescue group (mean $1690 per ED visit) and (by extrapolation from the sample selected) $147,971 for the standard therapy group (mean $2027 per ED visit). The total direct cost of the 423 "rescue visits" was $33,647 (mean $80 per visit). In 79% of the 423 rescue encounters, the patients involved reported no residual functional disability 24 hours following treatment. Of those in the rescue group who sought in-clinic rescue, 89% reported themselves "very satisfied" with such management.

CONCLUSION

Providing the alternative of in-clinic "rescue" for acute migraine refractory to self-administered therapy offers an attractive alternative for patients and appears to substantially lower use of an ED for headache treatment and the cost associated with that use.

摘要

背景

对于症状经自我治疗无效的急性偏头痛患者,目前的治疗选择有限。

目的

评估为急性偏头痛患者提供门诊“急救”治疗的管理方案的临床实用性和成本效益。

方法

连续200例到大学头痛门诊就诊的偏头痛患者被随机分为两组,一组接受急性偏头痛的最佳自我药物治疗(“标准治疗”),另一组接受类似治疗,并且如果自我治疗无效可选择门诊注射药物治疗(“急救治疗”)。随机分到后一组的患者每月最多限制进行2次“急救就诊”,所有患者随访一年。对在门诊接受“急救”的患者在治疗后24小时进行电话随访,以评估其治疗反应。主要分析是比较两组在一年研究期内记录的因头痛到急诊科就诊的次数。对于急救组的所有急诊科就诊以及标准组中随机选择的同等数量的急诊科就诊,评估与这些就诊相关的直接费用,并且记录和分析所有门诊急救就诊的直接费用。

结果

研究的两组在年龄、性别比例、偏头痛亚型、基线时与偏头痛相关的残疾状况以及医疗保险覆盖类型/范围方面相似。在一年的研究期内,急救组记录了423次门诊急救就诊,并报告了27次因头痛治疗到急诊科就诊。标准治疗组报告了73次急诊科就诊(27次对73次;P <.01)。急救组与急诊科就诊相关的总直接费用为45,330美元(每次急诊科就诊平均1690美元),标准治疗组(根据所选样本推断)为147,971美元(每次急诊科就诊平均2027美元)。423次“急救就诊”的总直接费用为33,647美元(每次就诊平均80美元)。在423次急救就诊中,79%的患者在治疗后24小时报告无残余功能残疾。在急救组中寻求门诊急救的患者中,89%报告对这种管理“非常满意”。

结论

为自我治疗无效的急性偏头痛患者提供门诊“急救”选择为患者提供了一种有吸引力的替代方案,并且似乎大大降低了因头痛治疗到急诊科就诊的次数以及与之相关的费用。

相似文献

1
Examining the utility of in-clinic "rescue" therapy for acute migraine.研究门诊“急救”疗法对急性偏头痛的效用。
Headache. 2008 Jun;48(6):939-43. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4610.2008.01165.x.
2
Botulinum toxin type A as migraine preventive treatment in patients previously failing oral prophylactic treatment due to compliance issues.A型肉毒杆菌毒素用于因依从性问题而导致口服预防性治疗失败的偏头痛患者的预防性治疗。
Headache. 2008 Jun;48(6):900-13. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4610.2007.00953.x. Epub 2007 Nov 28.
3
Oral transmucosal fentanyl citrate for the treatment of migraine headache pain in outpatients: a case series.口腔黏膜枸橼酸芬太尼用于门诊偏头痛疼痛治疗:病例系列
Headache. 2004 Sep;44(8):762-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4610.2004.04142.x.
4
The impact of intensive patient education on clinical outcome in a clinic-based migraine population.强化患者教育对以诊所为基础的偏头痛人群临床结局的影响。
Headache. 2006 May;46(5):726-31. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4610.2006.00428.x.
5
Economic burden of transformed migraine: results from the American Migraine Prevalence and Prevention (AMPP) Study.转化型偏头痛的经济负担:美国偏头痛患病率与预防(AMPP)研究结果
Headache. 2009 Apr;49(4):498-508. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4610.2009.01369.x. Epub 2009 Feb 25.
6
Duration of migraine is a predictor for response to botulinum toxin type A.偏头痛的持续时间是A型肉毒杆菌毒素反应的一个预测指标。
Headache. 2005 Apr;45(4):308-14. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4610.2005.05067.x.
7
Cost of health care among patients with chronic and episodic migraine in Canada and the USA: results from the International Burden of Migraine Study (IBMS).加拿大和美国慢性和阵发性偏头痛患者的医疗保健成本:国际偏头痛负担研究(IBMS)的结果。
Headache. 2011 Jul-Aug;51(7):1058-77. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4610.2011.01945.x.
8
A clinical trial of trimethobenzamide/diphenhydramine versus sumatriptan for acute migraines.曲美苄胺/苯海拉明与舒马曲坦治疗急性偏头痛的临床试验。
Headache. 2006 Jun;46(6):934-41. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4610.2006.00467.x.
9
The impact of a worksite migraine intervention program on work productivity, productivity costs, and non-workplace impairment among Spanish postal service employees from an employer perspective.从雇主角度看,工作场所偏头痛干预项目对西班牙邮政员工工作效率、生产力成本及非工作场所损伤的影响。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2004 Nov;20(11):1805-14. doi: 10.1185/030079904X10151.
10
Intravenous sodium valproate versus prochlorperazine for the emergency department treatment of acute migraine headaches: a prospective, randomized, double-blind trial.静脉注射丙戊酸钠与奋乃静用于急诊科治疗急性偏头痛:一项前瞻性、随机、双盲试验。
Ann Emerg Med. 2003 Jun;41(6):847-53. doi: 10.1067/mem.2003.195.

引用本文的文献

1
Cost effectiveness of pharmacotherapy for the prevention of migraine: a Markov model application.预防性偏头痛药物治疗的成本效益:马尔可夫模型应用。
CNS Drugs. 2010 Aug;24(8):695-712. doi: 10.2165/11531180-000000000-00000.