Hamzeh Behrooz, Farshi Mirtaghi Garousi, Laflamme Lucie
Division of International Health, Department of Public Health Sciences, Karolinska Institutet, Nobels väg 9, SE-171 77 Stockholm, Sweden.
BMC Public Health. 2008 Jun 12;8:209. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-8-209.
Population-based perception studies on potential causes and triggers of intimate partner violence against women (IPVAW) may enlighten context-relevant primary preventive actions in settings where data are limited. This study, conducted in one specific city, deals with married women's opinions concerning potential causes and triggers of IPVAW and seeks to highlight areas of consensus and divergence in the views.
A convenient sample of women aged 25-45 years and married for at least 5 years was consecutively recruited in the 48 public health centres of Kermanshah city, where free health services are provided to mothers and children under 6 years old. Respondents were individually interviewed on site by trained and experienced female interviewers (response rate 94.3%). A structured pilot-tested questionnaire was used that consisted mainly of closed questions about individual assessment of the extent to which various items could be regarded as a potential cause, a potential trigger or a potential consequence of IPVAW. Individual item frequencies were compiled and the association between socio-demographic attributes of the spouses and also respondents' prior exposure to violence and women answers was explored.
For most factors covered, women mainly "agreed" or "agreed very much" about their potential as a trigger or a cause of IPVAW; agreements were stronger for individual-related potential causes. Generally, women's socio-demographic characteristics and prior victimisation did not much affect the opinions they expressed. For some triggers however, women's own occupation and their husband's educational level affected how much in agreement they were.
The women interviewed consider that most potential causes and triggers proposed may, at some point in a relationship, engender IPVAW. In the main, their views are not much altered by their own and their husbands' socioeconomic position or their prior victimisation. It remains to be seen whether married men and, for that matter, even women married for a shorter duration or from other settings will answer in a similar manner.
在数据有限的情况下,基于人群对亲密伴侣暴力侵害妇女行为(IPVAW)的潜在原因和触发因素的认知研究,可能会为相关背景下的初级预防行动提供启示。本研究在一个特定城市开展,探讨已婚妇女对IPVAW潜在原因和触发因素的看法,并试图突出观点中的共识和分歧领域。
在克尔曼沙赫市的48个公共卫生中心连续招募了年龄在25 - 45岁且结婚至少5年的女性作为便利样本,这些中心为6岁以下的母亲和儿童提供免费医疗服务。由训练有素且经验丰富的女性访谈员在现场对受访者进行单独访谈(应答率94.3%)。使用了一份经过预测试的结构化问卷,主要由关于个人对各种项目可被视为IPVAW潜在原因、潜在触发因素或潜在后果程度的封闭式问题组成。汇总了各个项目的频率,并探讨了配偶的社会人口学属性之间以及受访者先前遭受暴力经历与女性回答之间的关联。
对于所涵盖的大多数因素,女性主要“同意”或“非常同意”它们作为IPVAW触发因素或原因的可能性;对于与个人相关的潜在原因,共识更强。总体而言,女性的社会人口学特征和先前的受害经历对她们表达的观点影响不大。然而,对于一些触发因素,女性自身的职业和丈夫的教育水平会影响她们的同意程度。
接受访谈的女性认为,所提出的大多数潜在原因和触发因素在某种关系中可能会引发IPVAW。总体而言,她们的观点不会因自身和丈夫的社会经济地位或先前的受害经历而有太大改变。已婚男性以及结婚时间较短或来自其他背景的女性是否会给出类似回答,仍有待观察。