Palmer Lucy B, Smaldone Gerald C, Chen John J, Baram Daniel, Duan Tao, Monteforte Melinda, Varela Marie, Tempone Ann K, O'Riordan Thomas, Daroowalla Feroza, Richman Paul
Department of Medicine, Pulmonary/Critical Care Division, University Hospital, State University of New York at Stony Brook, Stony Brook, New York, USA.
Crit Care Med. 2008 Jul;36(7):2008-13. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31817c0f9e.
In critically ill intubated patients, signs of respiratory infection often persist despite treatment with potent systemic antibiotics.
The purpose of this study was to determine whether aerosolized antibiotics, which achieve high drug concentrations in the target organ, would more effectively treat respiratory infection and decrease the need for systemic antibiotics.
Double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study performed from 2003 through 2004.
The medical and surgical intensive care units of a university hospital.
Critically ill intubated patients were randomized if: 1) > or = 18 yrs of age, intubated for a minimum of 3 days, and expected to survive at least 14 days; and 2) had ventilator-associated tracheobronchitis defined as the production of purulent secretions (> or = 2 mL during 4 hrs) with organism(s) on Gram stain. Of 104 patients monitored, 43 consented for treatment and completed the study. No patients were withdrawn from the study for adverse events.
Aerosol antibiotic (AA) or aerosol saline placebo was given for 14 days or until extubation. The responsible clinician determined the administration of systemic antibiotics (SA). Patients were followed for 28 days.
Primary: Centers for Disease Control National Nosocomial Infection Survey diagnostic criteria for ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) and clinical pulmonary infection score. Secondary: white blood cell count, SA use, acquired antibiotic resistance, and weaning from mechanical ventilation.
Most patients had VAP at randomization. With treatment, the AA group had reduced signs of respiratory infection: reduced Centers for Disease Control National Nosocomial Infection Survey VAP (14/19; 73.6%) to (5/14; 35.7%) vs. placebo (18/24; 75%) to (11/14; 78.6%), reduction in clinical pulmonary infection score, lower white blood cell count at day 14, reduced bacterial resistance, reduced use of SA, and increased weaning (all p < or = .05).
In critically ill patients with ventilator-associated tracheobronchitis, AA decrease VAP and other signs and symptoms of respiratory infection, facilitate weaning, and reduce bacterial resistance and use of systemic antibiotics.
在重症插管患者中,尽管使用了强效全身用抗生素进行治疗,但呼吸道感染的症状往往持续存在。
本研究的目的是确定雾化抗生素(在靶器官中可达到高药物浓度)是否能更有效地治疗呼吸道感染并减少全身用抗生素的使用需求。
2003年至2004年进行的双盲、随机、安慰剂对照研究。
一所大学医院的内科和外科重症监护病房。
重症插管患者若符合以下条件则被随机分组:1)年龄≥18岁,插管至少3天,且预计存活至少14天;2)患有呼吸机相关性气管支气管炎,定义为有脓性分泌物产生(4小时内≥2毫升)且革兰氏染色发现病原体。在监测的104例患者中,43例同意接受治疗并完成了研究。没有患者因不良事件退出研究。
给予雾化抗生素(AA)或雾化生理盐水安慰剂,持续14天或直至拔管。负责的临床医生决定全身用抗生素(SA)的使用。对患者随访28天。
主要指标:疾病控制中心国家医院感染调查中呼吸机相关性肺炎(VAP)的诊断标准和临床肺部感染评分。次要指标:白细胞计数、SA的使用、获得性抗生素耐药性以及机械通气撤机情况。
大多数患者在随机分组时患有VAP。经过治疗,AA组呼吸道感染症状减轻:疾病控制中心国家医院感染调查的VAP发生率从(14/19;73.6%)降至(5/14;35.7%),而安慰剂组从(18/24;75%)降至(11/14;78.6%),临床肺部感染评分降低,第14天白细胞计数降低,细菌耐药性降低,SA使用减少,撤机增加(所有p≤0.05)。
在患有呼吸机相关性气管支气管炎的重症患者中,AA可降低VAP及其他呼吸道感染的体征和症状,促进撤机,并降低细菌耐药性和全身用抗生素的使用。