Myrianthefs Pavlos, Zakynthinos George E, Tsolaki Vasiliki, Makris Demosthenes
"Agioi Anargyroi" General Hospital, School of Health Sciences, Department of Nursing, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 14564 Athens, Greece.
Third Cardiology Clinic, University of Athens, Sotiria Hospital, 11526 Athens, Greece.
Antibiotics (Basel). 2023 Apr 23;12(5):801. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics12050801.
Ventilator-associated lower respiratory tract infectious complications in critically ill patients cover a wide spectrum of one disease process (respiratory infection), initiating from tracheal tube and/or tracheobronchial colonization, to ventilator associated tracheobronchitis (VAT) and ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP). VAP occurence has been associated with increased intensive care unit (ICU) morbidity (ventilator days, as well as length of ICU and hospital stay) and ICU mortality. Therefore, treatments that aim at VAP/VAT incidence reduction are a high priority.
The aim of the present review is to discuss the current literature concerning two major aspects: (a) can aerosolized antibiotics (AA) administered in a pre-emptive way prevent the occurrence of ventilator-associated infections? and (b) can VAT treatment with aerosolized avert the potential evolution to VAP?
There were identified eight studies that provided data on the use of aerosolized antibiotics for the prevention of VAT/VAP. Most of them report favorable data on reducing the colonisation rate and the progression to VAP/VAT. Another four studies dealt with the treatment of VAT/VAP. The results support the decrease in the incidence to VAP transition and/or the improvement in signs and symptoms of VAP. Moreover, there are concise reports on higher cure rates and microbiological eradication in patients treated with aerosolized antibiotics. Yet, differences in the delivery modality adopted and resistance emergence issues preclude the generalisability of the results.
Aerosolized antibiotic therapy can be used to manage ventilator-associated infections, especially those with difficult to treat resistance. The limited clinical data raise the need for large randomized controlled trials to confirm the benefits of AA and to evaluate the impact on antibiotic selection pressure.
重症患者呼吸机相关性下呼吸道感染并发症涵盖了广泛的单一疾病过程(呼吸道感染),始于气管导管和/或气管支气管定植,发展为呼吸机相关性气管支气管炎(VAT)和呼吸机相关性肺炎(VAP)。VAP的发生与重症监护病房(ICU)发病率增加(呼吸机使用天数、ICU住院时间和住院时间)以及ICU死亡率相关。因此,旨在降低VAP/VAT发病率的治疗是当务之急。
本综述的目的是讨论当前文献中关于两个主要方面的内容:(a)预防性使用雾化抗生素(AA)能否预防呼吸机相关性感染的发生?(b)雾化治疗VAT能否避免其潜在发展为VAP?
共确定了八项关于使用雾化抗生素预防VAT/VAP的研究。其中大多数报告了在降低定植率和VAP/VAT进展方面的有利数据。另外四项研究涉及VAT/VAP的治疗。结果支持VAP转化率降低和/或VAP体征和症状改善。此外,有简要报告称雾化抗生素治疗的患者治愈率更高且微生物清除效果更好。然而,所采用的给药方式差异和耐药性出现问题妨碍了结果的推广。
雾化抗生素疗法可用于治疗呼吸机相关性感染,尤其是那些耐药性难以治疗的感染。有限的临床数据表明需要进行大型随机对照试验,以证实AA的益处并评估其对抗生素选择压力的影响。