Lu Mingyang, Dousis Athanasios D, Ma Jianpeng
Verna and Marrs McLean Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas 77030, USA.
Protein Sci. 2008 Sep;17(9):1576-85. doi: 10.1110/ps.035022.108. Epub 2008 Jun 12.
In this paper, we introduce a fast and accurate side-chain modeling method, named OPUS-Rota. In a benchmark comparison with the methods SCWRL, NCN, LGA, SPRUCE, Rosetta, and SCAP, OPUS-Rota is shown to be much faster than all the methods except SCWRL, which is comparably fast. In terms of overall chi (1) and chi (1+2) accuracies, however, OPUS-Rota is 5.4 and 8.8 percentage points better, respectively, than SCWRL. Compared with NCN, which has the best accuracy in the literature, OPUS-Rota is 1.6 percentage points better for overall chi (1+2) but 0.3 percentage points weaker for overall chi (1). Hence, our algorithm is much more accurate than SCWRL with similar execution speed, and it has accuracy comparable to or better than the most accurate methods in the literature, but with a runtime that is one or two orders of magnitude shorter. In addition, OPUS-Rota consistently outperforms SCWRL on the Wallner and Elofsson homology-modeling benchmark set when the sequence identity is greater than 40%. We hope that OPUS-Rota will contribute to high-accuracy structure refinement, and the computer program is freely available for academic users.
在本文中,我们介绍了一种快速且准确的侧链建模方法,名为OPUS-Rota。在与SCWRL、NCN、LGA、SPRUCE、Rosetta和SCAP等方法的基准比较中,结果表明,除了速度相当的SCWRL外,OPUS-Rota比所有其他方法都要快得多。然而,在整体χ(1)和χ(1+2)准确性方面,OPUS-Rota分别比SCWRL高5.4和8.8个百分点。与文献中准确性最高的NCN相比,OPUS-Rota在整体χ(1+2)上高1.6个百分点,但在整体χ(1)上低0.3个百分点。因此,我们的算法在执行速度相似的情况下比SCWRL更准确,并且其准确性与文献中最准确的方法相当或更好,但运行时间要短一到两个数量级。此外,当序列同一性大于40%时,OPUS-Rota在Wallner和Elofsson同源建模基准集上始终优于SCWRL。我们希望OPUS-Rota将有助于高精度结构优化,并且该计算机程序可供学术用户免费使用。